Teams

Reasner 7.0 Mixed 55 S

2023 Decatur Summer Mixed Other - 55 and Over 6.0-9.0 · 7.0 Senior Mixed

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2023-07-01Won 10
W#3 DoublesDebra Weaver / Thomas Hargrove vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-06-27vs Frith 7.0 Mixed 55Lost 01
L#1 DoublesThomas Hargrove / Kim Anderson vs David Simmons / Kay Noller2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Senior Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Debra Weaver
published 4
3.34
Ryan Cate Gibson
published
3.29
Keith Estes
published
3.28
Elizabeth Kenney
published 3.5
3.27
PETER DEROCHEMONT
published
3.22
Eduardo DelaPaz
published 3.5
3.17
Judy Wiles
published
3.15
Thomas Hargrove
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.12
Dennis Reasner
published 3.5
2.91
Fred Burkert
published 3
2.90
Laura Reasner
published
2.87
Linda Brewster
published
Kim Anderson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Reasner + Dennis Reasner3748% games+0.7% vs expected
Fred Burkert + Debra Weaver0728% games−23.2% vs expected
PETER DEROCHEMONT + Linda Brewster303 matchesnot enough data
Judy Wiles + Dennis Reasner033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Debra Weaver
95W–75L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.61
Ryan Cate Gibson
60W–94L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
3.34
Keith Estes
16W–11L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Elizabeth Kenney
60W–51L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.28
PETER DEROCHEMONT
19W–21L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Eduardo DelaPaz
8W–11L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.22
Judy Wiles
61W–81L career · no lines in 2023
10%90%1%
3.17
Thomas Hargrove
88W–115L career · 2 lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Dennis Reasner
26W–48L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.12
3
Fred Burkert
28W–52L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
2.91
Laura Reasner
19W–40L career · no lines in 2023
77%23%<1%
2.90
Linda Brewster
43W–76L career · no lines in 2023
84%16%<1%
2.87
Kim Anderson
8W–14L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.