Teams

Kiwi - Hargrove

2024 Brevard Trilevel · 4.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.33 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 DoublesThomas Hargrove / Michael Carpenter vs Luiz Traversin / Elliott Hogans4-6, 4-6
2024-08-07vs EFSC - WhiteSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMichael Carpenter / Benjamin Smith vs Andy McConnell / Eddie White3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesThomas Hargrove / Jeffrey Nickerson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-07-29vs Fee - AcquavivaLost 02
L#1 DoublesBenjamin Smith / Michael Carpenter vs Christopher Meenen / Christian Maldonado3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesThomas Hargrove / Jeffrey Nickerson vs David Castillo / Brent Traina2-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesBenjamin Smith / Michael Carpenter vs James Hartnett / Norman Hosan6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesThomas Hargrove / Jeffrey Nickerson vs Krishna Addagarla / Nathan Hartnett1-6, 2-6
2024-07-10vs EFSC - WhiteWon 20
W#1 DoublesMichael Carpenter / Benjamin Smith vs Andy McConnell / Eddie White6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesThomas Hargrove / Jeffrey Nickerson vs Zach Dahl / Darron King6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesThomas Hargrove / Michael Carpenter vs Kyle McIntosh / Trey Crowley1-6, 4-6
2024-06-24vs Fee - AcquavivaWon 10
W#1 DoublesBenjamin Smith / Michael Carpenter vs Hart Arnold / Christian Maldonado6-1, 6-2
W#1 DoublesBenjamin Smith / Michael Carpenter vs Patrick McGuigan / James Hartnett6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesThomas Hargrove / Jeffrey Nickerson vs Krishna Addagarla / Nathan Hartnett4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Benjamin Smith
published 4
3.74
Michael Carpenter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Thomas Hargrove
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.03
Noel Donaghey
published
2.98
Jurgis Bredikis
published
2.92
Chris Warticki
published 3
2.68
Kevin Recker
published
2.67
Anthony Michaels
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kevin Recker + Chris Warticki4449% games−4.8% vs expected
Noel Donaghey + Jurgis Bredikis5066% gamesnot enough data
Thomas Hargrove + Michael Carpenter224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Benjamin Smith
15W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.89
Michael Carpenter
44W–47L career · 8 lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.74
Thomas Hargrove
88W–115L career · 7 lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
3.15
Noel Donaghey
18W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%41%59%
3.03
Jurgis Bredikis
17W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Chris Warticki
20W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
2.92
Kevin Recker
12W–12L career · no lines in 2024
9%91%1%
2.68
3
Anthony Michaels
2W–8L career · no lines in 2024
10%90%1%
2.67

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.