Teams

Senioritas

2025 Montgomery Adult 55 & Over · Montgomery Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-07-01vs Racket Reines 55+ 7.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesCarol Gover / Chrystal Goonewardene vs Tana Jankowiak / Li Ives6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAmy Horton / Nancy Trimble vs Zheng Dong / De'Ana Dow0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDaphne Fuller / Katherine Dodson vs Michele Bloom / Maria Angelica Camp1-6, 5-7
2025-06-28vs Collagen QueensWon 21
W#1 DoublesMeaghan McHugh / Sharynne Nenon vs Carol Darling / Sharon Tennyson6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChrystal Goonewardene / Isaura H Martinez vs Corlyn Krinsky / Leslie Mansfield3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesKatherine Dodson / Carol Gover vs Julie Chrisco Andrews / Patricia Daugherty6-4, 6-1
2025-06-24vs Racket Reines 55+ 7.0Won 20
W#2 DoublesChrystal Goonewardene / Carol Gover vs Pamela KANSTOROOM / Marie Sokoloff2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAmy Horton / Nancy Trimble vs Regina Farrington / Gay Trinkner7-6, 4-4
2025-06-22vs Racket Reines 55+ 7.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesSharynne Nenon / Meaghan McHugh vs Tana Jankowiak / Miyuki Sato5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAngela Ferguson / Carol Gover vs Li Ives / Gillian Moorhead5-7, 4-5
L#3 DoublesAmy Horton / Nancy Trimble vs Michele Bloom / Maria Angelica Camp2-6, 4-6
2025-06-18vs Collagen QueensLost 02
L#2 DoublesChrystal Goonewardene / Nancy Trimble vs Meghan Smith / Karlene Brathwaite0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKatherine Dodson / Daphne Fuller vs Sharon Tennyson / Lynn Daggett2-6, 2-6
2025-06-07vs Collagen QueensWon 20
W#1 DoublesMeaghan McHugh / Sharynne Nenon vs Leslie Mansfield / Sharon Tennyson6-4, 6-6
W#3 DoublesAmy Horton / Nancy Trimble vs Julie Chrisco Andrews / Patricia Daugherty6-4, 6-3
2025-05-30vs Racket Reines 55+ 7.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMeaghan McHugh / Sharynne Nenon vs Miyuki Sato / Zheng Dong4-6, 2-6
2025-05-19vs Collagen QueensLost 12
L#1 DoublesCarol Gover / Amy Horton vs Sharon Tennyson / Lynn Daggett4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesChrystal Goonewardene / Sandy Snyder vs Meghan Smith / Leslie Mansfield2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNancy Trimble / Sharynne Nenon vs Karlene Brathwaite / Julie Chrisco Andrews2-6, 3-6
2025-05-01vs Racket Reines 55+ 7.0Lost 02
L#2 DoublesSandy Snyder / Sharynne Nenon vs Suzanne Krudys / Miyuki Sato1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesNancy Trimble / Daphne Fuller vs Michele Bloom / Maria Angelica Camp2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Meaghan McHugh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.31
Daphne Fuller
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Carol Gover
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.30
Julia Latein-Kimmig
published
Anne Christman
published 3.5
Isaura H Martinez
published 3.5
3.15
Katherine Dodson
published
3.03
Angela Ferguson
published 3.5
3.02
Amy Horton
published 3.5
2.97
Chrystal Goonewardene
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.95
Nancy Trimble
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
2.83
Sharynne Nenon
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
Jossine Josz
published
Marie Kelly
published
Sandy Snyder
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carol Gover + Katherine Dodson7843% games−4.9% vs expected
Nancy Trimble + Chrystal Goonewardene3643% games−9.6% vs expected
Meaghan McHugh + Sharynne Nenon224 matchesnot enough data
Carol Gover + Meaghan McHugh303 matchesnot enough data
Carol Gover + Julia Latein-Kimmig213 matchesnot enough data
Katherine Dodson + Julia Latein-Kimmig123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Meaghan McHugh
115W–75L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.98
3.5
Daphne Fuller
60W–93L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Carol Gover
120W–213L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
Julia Latein-Kimmig
14W–19L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Anne Christman
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Isaura H Martinez
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Katherine Dodson
44W–68L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Angela Ferguson
1W–8L career · no lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.03
3.5
Amy Horton
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.02
3.5
Chrystal Goonewardene
33W–41L career · 5 lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
2.97
3.5
Nancy Trimble
252W–415L career · 7 lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
2.95
3
Sharynne Nenon
46W–54L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.83
Jossine Josz
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Marie Kelly
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sandy Snyder
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.