Teams

JCA - Seeker

2022 Duval Adult 40 & Over - Women · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-03-21vs Baymeadows - JohnsonLost 01
L#1 DoublesKelly Cusick / Lauri Thomas vs Danijela Pope / Jen Graham4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-03-20vs The Plantation - PensottiSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSusan Sceifers / Kelly Cusick vs Kelly Davis / Louise Jack6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Seeker vs Brianne Toole3-6, 4-6
2022-03-05vs Southside - BerrySplit 11
L#1 DoublesStaci Hill / Elizabeth Seeker vs Lezita Davis / Shari Shuman6-0, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKelly Cusick / Susan Sceifers vs Sandy Wedge / Vicki Carden2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-02-27Split 11
L#1 DoublesStaci Hill / Elizabeth Seeker vs Sallie Ball / Jennifer Levinson3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesKelly Cusick / Lauri Thomas vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Seeker / Susan Sceifers vs Brooke Anderson / Meredith Frisch1-6, 0-6
2022-01-30vs Huguenot - WatersSplit 11
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Seeker vs Erin Wolf5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKelly Cusick / Lauri Thomas vs Aura Bernal / Manisha Valentin6-4, 6-2
2022-01-23vs Julington Creek - BermanLost 02
L#1 DoublesStaci Hill / Kelly Cusick vs Anna Neal / Heather Storey2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Seeker vs Caroline Becker3-6, 3-6
2022-01-16Lost 01
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Seeker vs Heather Riley7-6, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Kelly Cusick
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.40
Elizabeth Seeker
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.20
Amy Rice
published 3.5
3.18
Debra Sussman
published 3.5
3.02
Staci Hill
published
2.87
Kim Alexander
published
Rosemary Arnold
published
Susan Sceifers
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Cusick + Elizabeth Seeker251359% games+2.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelly Cusick
107W–55L career · 6 lines in 2022
28%71%<1%
3.57
3.5
Elizabeth Seeker
82W–64L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.40
3.5
Amy Rice
5W–6L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.20
3.5
Debra Sussman
9W–6L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
Staci Hill
20W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%45%55%
3.02
Kim Alexander
7W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%15%
2.87
Rosemary Arnold
0W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Susan Sceifers
12W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.