Teams

Summer

TC EXCHANGE · 7.0 MX

28 players · average NTRP 3.71 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 7.0 MX have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 21 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Natalie Allison
published
4.02
Matthew Knutson
published
3.78
3.75
Justin Graham
published
3.68
Lydia Crouser
published
3.66
Addie Ormsbee
published 4
3.51
Caron Dwyer
published 4
3.49
Andrew Womeldorf
published 3.5
3.43
Ellen Dobbins
published 3.5
3.42
Nick George
published
3.38
David Wiggins
published 3.5
3.32
Emma Hartmann
published 3.5
3.27
Karan Sumra
published
3.22
Jeremy Ewers
published
3.21
Molly Lyons
published
2.97
Kristen Renehan
published
2.89
Karina Sahlin
published
2.85
Jasmine Scarlett
published
2.67
2.60
2.23
Noreen Pfadenhauer
published
Jennifer Katz
published
Jennifer Norstrem
published
Jenny Liu
published
Karen Hansen
published
Kimberly Michalak
published
Lindsay Whalen
published
Sandra Marble
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeremy Ewers + Karan Sumra6549% games−2.1% vs expected
Morgan Castrogiovanni + Kristen Renehan123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Natalie Allison
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%<1%
4.13
Matthew Knutson
30W–19L career · no lines in 2024
<1%44%56%
4.02
4
Chandha Duwearatchi
14W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.78
Justin Graham
6W–9L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.75
Lydia Crouser
21W–35L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Addie Ormsbee
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%<1%
3.66
4
Caron Dwyer
1W–10L career · no lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
3.51
3.5
Andrew Womeldorf
14W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%54%46%
3.49
3.5
Ellen Dobbins
50W–19L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
3.43
Nick George
10W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
David Wiggins
14W–3L career · type A · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Emma Hartmann
6W–2L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.32
Karan Sumra
9W–7L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
Jeremy Ewers
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%2%
3.22
Molly Lyons
9W–13L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
3.21
Kristen Renehan
23W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
2.97
Karina Sahlin
3W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
2.89
Jasmine Scarlett
10W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%86%13%
2.85
Maria Tcherni-Buzzeo
13W–27L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
2.67
Morgan Castrogiovanni
8W–23L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
2.60
Noreen Pfadenhauer
6W–7L career · no lines in 2024
0%98%2%
2.23
Jennifer Katz
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jennifer Norstrem
16W–20L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jenny Liu
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Karen Hansen
0W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kimberly Michalak
7W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lindsay Whalen
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sandra Marble
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.