Teams

5-OGorbacheva-Eno

2022 Eno River Adult 18 & Over · 18 & Over Adult 4.0 Women-Evening

10 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-05-05vs 3-LBolger-EnoWon 10
W#1 DoublesChristina Aldereguia / Jenna Schreiber vs Gwynn Thayer / Meryl Golder6-2, 6-3
2022-05-03vs 7-SLantry-EnoLost 01
L#1 DoublesChristina Aldereguia / Jenna Schreiber vs Carrie Guthrie / Michelle Then4-6, 1-6
2022-04-26vs 6-SBaldwin-EnoLost 01
L#1 DoublesChristina Aldereguia / Jenna Schreiber vs Lynise Devance / Roberta Hadley6-7, 4-6
2022-04-12Lost 01
L#1 SinglesLauren Triebert vs Chanel Chambers0-6, 2-6
2022-04-07vs 2-JRoss-EnoLost 01
L#2 DoublesLauren Triebert / Anna Creissen vs Beth O'Donnell / Sharon Campbell4-6, 1-6
2022-03-24vs 6-SBaldwin-EnoLost 01
L#2 SinglesLauren Triebert vs Nichole Hatcher4-6, 1-6
2022-03-22vs 3-LBolger-EnoLost 01
L#1 SinglesJenna Schreiber vs Meghan Zerkel2-6, 1-6
2022-03-10vs 1-ELinnander-EnoLost 01
L#1 SinglesJenna Schreiber vs Tiffany Langino2-6, 4-6
2022-03-03vs 7-SLantry-EnoLost 01
L#2 SinglesLauren Triebert vs Anna Koltchagova1-6, 4-6
2022-03-01vs 2-JRoss-EnoLost 02
L#1 SinglesJenna Schreiber vs Valerie Acre6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Harvie / Lauren Triebert vs Meghan Howard / Maggie Wang1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 4.0 Women-Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Oxana Gorbacheva
published
3.80
Elizabeth Harvie
published 4
3.72
Jenna Schreiber
usually #1 Singles 58%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.68
Emily Childs
published 4
3.40
Anna Creissen
published 3.5
3.31
Lauren Triebert
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.13
Judith Stewart
published
3.02
Alison Doherty
published 3
2.87
Sheza Healey
published
Janel Green
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Oxana Gorbacheva
26W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.89
4
Elizabeth Harvie
26W–19L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Jenna Schreiber
65W–56L career · 12 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Emily Childs
39W–42L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.68
3.5
Anna Creissen
12W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Lauren Triebert
168W–123L career · 8 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
Judith Stewart
8W–11L career · no lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.13
3
Alison Doherty
9W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%44%56%
3.02
Sheza Healey
13W–27L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
2.87
Janel Green
18W–11L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.