Teams

IA/Pham/40&Over9.0X

2025 IA 40 & Over Adult Mixed League · 9.0 Mixed

13 players · average NTRP 4.38 / IOWA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-04vs HansonWon 21
W#1 DoublesRenato Motoyama / Allison Davidson Motoyama vs Lindsay Chase / Brandon Willett6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPedro Gonzalez / Greta Rath vs Sebastien Feve / Deana Hoganson7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKorri ClarkWilt / Jacob Birk vs Brent Hanson / Lynette Brown6-7, 5-7
2025-04-06vs HansonWon 30
W#1 DoublesRyan Staiert / Marina McCollom vs Sebastien Feve / Deana Hoganson6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesGreta Rath / Adam Rothert vs Brandon Willett / Jessica Stewart6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKorri ClarkWilt / Jacob Birk vs Anil Jha / Miriam Skrade7-5, 6-1
2025-03-09vs HansonLost 12
W#1 DoublesMarina McCollom / Ryan Staiert vs Lynette Brown / Blake Schneider6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesPedro Gonzalez / Heidi Hill-Matthes vs Sebastien Feve / Jessica Stewart2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesGreta Rath / Jordan Brackey vs Brent Hanson / Lindsay Chase4-6, 1-6
2025-02-23vs HansonWon 30
W#1 DoublesAdam Rothert / Allison Davidson Motoyama vs Sebastien Feve / Karen Barnes6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesRyan Staiert / Marina McCollom vs Lindsay Chase / Brandon Willett6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesPedro Gonzalez / Greta Rath vs Blake Schneider / Debbie Mackaman6-1, 6-3
2025-02-09vs HansonWon 21
W#1 DoublesRenato Motoyama / Allison Davidson Motoyama vs Lindsay Chase / Brandon Willett6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRachel Morrissey / Pedro Gonzalez vs Brent Hanson / Karen Barnes6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesRyan Staiert / Korri ClarkWilt vs Sebastien Feve / Rachel Morgan6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-01-19vs HansonWon 20
W#1 DoublesRenato Motoyama / Allison Davidson Motoyama vs Sebastien Feve / Siri Long6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAdam Rothert / Rachel Morrissey vs Rachel Morgan / Blake Schneider6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 9.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1IA/Pham/40&Over9.0X511448119
2Hanson1541429202

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.11 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.43
Allison Davidson Motoyama
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.35
Renato Motoyama
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.34
Adam Rothert
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.29
Rachel Morrissey
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
4.25
Jacob Birk
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.22
Ryan Staiert
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.18
Jordan Brackey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.17
Heidi Hill-Matthes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.01
Marina McCollom
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.77
Anne Pham
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.65
Korri ClarkWilt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Greta Rath
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
Pedro Gonzalez
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marina McCollom + Ryan Staiert5166% games+21.9% vs expected
Allison Davidson Motoyama + Renato Motoyama9066% games+1.6% vs expected
Korri ClarkWilt + Ryan Staiert314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Allison Davidson Motoyama
37W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%71%28%
4.43
4.5
Renato Motoyama
53W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
4.35
4.5
Adam Rothert
89W–45L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
4.34
Rachel Morrissey
36W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
4.29
4.5
Jacob Birk
13W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Ryan Staiert
83W–46L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
4.22
Jordan Brackey
14W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%1%
4.18
4.5
Heidi Hill-Matthes
37W–35L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
4.17
Marina McCollom
15W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
4.01
4
Anne Pham
99W–29L career · 7 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
Korri ClarkWilt
26W–55L career · 3 lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
Greta Rath
139W–93L career · 7 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60
Pedro Gonzalez
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.