Teams

Plantation Rock Lobsters

2026 Sarasota Combo 18 & Over Summer · 8.5 W Thursday

13 players · average NTRP 4.21 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-10vs LBK Public SmashersLost 12
L#1 DoublesMarjorie Petruccelli / Robyn Scalzo vs Pat Brugger / Lisa Tyson2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesConnie Weiss / Lisa Rott vs Wendy Hillock / Kristin Knous7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAna Areosa / Susan Gammon vs Susan King / Jennifer Esposito7-5, 6-4
2026-08-06vs LWR Liquid RanchersWon 21
L#1 DoublesAna Areosa / Maureen Thomas vs Megan McAloon / Kim Eck3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesChristy Smith / Susan Gammon vs Natalie Bloch / Nia Esposito3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJanet Kramer / Beth Costa vs Christine Handel / Diana Stadelnikas4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-07-23vs Payne Park WilsonWon 21
W#1 DoublesAna Areosa / Maureen Thomas vs Sally Alford / Kara Beene2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChristy Smith / Marjorie Petruccelli vs Mary Wilson / Yudi Carpenter2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLynn Deuitch / Beth Costa vs Susan Marro / Michele Rose4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-07-16vs Wild Blue Wild CardsLost 03
L#1 DoublesRobyn Scalzo / Lee Bailey vs Kathryn Paige Ciano / Mary Gill3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Rott / Connie Weiss vs Linda Radovich / Sarah Anne Mcdonald3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJanet Kramer / Mitzi Lamy vs Cathy Maler / Karen Huffman1-6, 3-6
2026-07-02vs LWR Liquid RanchersLost 12
L#1 DoublesChristy Smith / Marjorie Petruccelli vs Megan McAloon / Allyson Hoffman4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAna Areosa / Susan Gammon vs Gina Hagopian / Carol Frazier2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLynn Deuitch / Maureen Thomas vs Natalie Bloch / Nia Esposito7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 W Thursday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.94 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Susan Gammon
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.10
Beth Costa
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.10
Marjorie Petruccelli
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.00
Lisa Rott
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.89
Ana Areosa
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.81
Lynn Deuitch
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Diane Crews
published 4
3.69
Connie Weiss
published 4
Janet Kramer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lee Bailey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Maureen Thomas
published
Mitzi Lamy
published
Robyn Scalzo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ana Areosa + Lynn Deuitch8751% games+0.3% vs expected
Ana Areosa + Marjorie Petruccelli8555% games−2.1% vs expected
Ana Areosa + Janet Kramer314 matchesnot enough data
Ana Areosa + Connie Weiss224 matchesnot enough data
Beth Costa + Lynn Deuitch123 matchesnot enough data
Lee Bailey + Lisa Rott033 matchesnot enough data
Robyn Scalzo + Lynn Deuitch213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan Gammon
5W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
4.12
4.5
Beth Costa
26W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
4.10
4.5
Marjorie Petruccelli
85W–64L career · 3 lines in 2026
24%75%<1%
4.10
4.5
Lisa Rott
65W–51L career · 2 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
4.00
4
Ana Areosa
139W–118L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.89
4
Lynn Deuitch
137W–135L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Diane Crews
6W–4L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Connie Weiss
2W–2L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
Janet Kramer
20W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lee Bailey
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Maureen Thomas
1W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Mitzi Lamy
5W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Robyn Scalzo
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.