Teams

Croome/Norby/HSV

2025 Adult 65 & Over · 3.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-09-27vs Kovaleski/LRLost 12
W#1 DoublesDan Bowholtz / Douglas Hicks vs Stephen Guffey / Robert Porbeck7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRichard Croome / Richard Jandl vs Francis Hartz / David Luneau2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesMadison Pope / Gary Strakshus vs Stephen Leake / Robert Lee2-6, 4-6
2025-09-27vs Korkames/FSLost 12
W#1 DoublesDan Bowholtz / Douglas Hicks vs Larry Schwartz / Ed Segeleon6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesRandy Bruno / Richard Jandl vs Kenneth Hammer / John Ragni3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesGary Strakshus / Bill Norby vs MICHAEL BEWLEY / Donald Baird2-6, 6-7
2025-09-26vs Richard/LRWon 21
L#1 DoublesDan Bowholtz / Richard Croome vs Anthony Kovacevic / Richard Kumi3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesRandy Bruno / Richard Jandl vs Terry Richard / John Boyd6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMadison Pope / Bill Norby vs Keith Skinner / Donald Miller6-4, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Bill Norby
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Madison Pope
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
Gary Strakshus
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Dan Bowholtz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.00
Randy Bruno
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Richard Croome
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Richard Jandl
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Madison Pope + Gary Strakshus3449% games−3.6% vs expected
Richard Jandl + Randy Bruno3345% gamesnot enough data
Gary Strakshus + Bill Norby033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bill Norby
11W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Madison Pope
5W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Gary Strakshus
6W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
3.5
Dan Bowholtz
3W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.06
Randy Bruno
6W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.00
Richard Croome
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Richard Jandl
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.