Teams

High Point /Kemp M7.0

2026 DALLAS TENNIS 65 & Over ADULT Friday · M7.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.33 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-08Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTim Bowling / Robert Garrity vs Mario Dominguez / Robert Davis3-6, 3-6
2026-04-24vs Canyon Creek/Jost M7.0Won 10
W#3 DoublesDavid Frame / Phil McGregor vs Brad Jost / James Warner6-1, 6-1
2026-04-17vs Lifetime Plano/Hoff-Walters M7.0Split 11
L#1 DoublesArt Anderson / James Musil vs Richard Agan / David Darouse3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesRobert Droke / Steve Wilson vs Kevin Haeberle / David Irons6-1, 6-3
2026-04-10vs NTRC/Tilak-Spittell M7.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesRobert Droke / James Musil vs Ted Peng / Joe Tom3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesArt Anderson / Robert Nicoud vs Rao Tilak / Edgar Santiago6-2, 6-1
2026-04-03vs Canyon Creek/Jost M7.0Won 10
W#3 DoublesArt Anderson / Robert Nicoud vs Stan Bradshaw / Mark Bailey6-0, 6-0
2026-03-27vs Lifetime Plano/Hoff-Walters M7.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesRobert Droke / Steve Wilson vs Richard Agan / Dan Burrows6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2026-03-20vs NTRC/Tilak-Spittell M7.0Won 10
W#3 DoublesArt Anderson / Steve Wilson vs Edgar Santiago / Joe Tom6-4, 6-3
2026-03-13vs Canyon Creek/Jost M7.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesRobert Droke / Steve Wilson vs James Marshall / Larry Reitzer6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · M7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1High Point /Kemp M7.08121617186
2Lifetime Plano/Hoff-Walters M7.07218921219
3NTRC/Tilak-Spittell M7.036121531250
4Canyon Creek/Jost M7.00932450318

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Andrew Steinbeck
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.44
Robert Droke
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.14
Art Anderson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.73
David Frame
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Donald Boliver
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Doug Crosby
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
James Musil
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published
Jim Newby
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Neil Fleming
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Phil McGregor
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Robert Garrity
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Robert Nicoud
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Steve Kemp
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrew Steinbeck + Donald Boliver404 matchesnot enough data
Doug Crosby + James Musil213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Andrew Steinbeck
13W–5L career · type A · 9 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.50
Robert Droke
11W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Art Anderson
4W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.14
3
David Frame
4W–2L career · type A · 1 line in 2026
5%92%2%
2.73
Donald Boliver
14W–2L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data
Doug Crosby
10W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
James Musil
7W–6L career · 9 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jim Newby
3W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Neil Fleming
0W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Phil McGregor
8W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Robert Garrity
4W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Robert Nicoud
2W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Steve Kemp
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.