Teams

NWW-HBSQ-Reda

2026 Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-24vs WSC-ACE-ZhuWon 30
W#1 DoublesKevin Mcdonald / Kumar Bhat vs Shawn Zhang / Zi Lin6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesIan Dangla vs Mitch Zhu6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDavid Eckols / Forrest Reda vs Eddie Tseng / Zhixu Li6-2, 6-1
2026-05-16vs TUK-Dub City-MesarosSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDavid Eckols / Kevin Mcdonald vs Paulo Mesaros / Jerry Osborn7-5, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKumar Bhat / Farhan Naeem Khan vs Connor Blomquist / Patrick Panlasigui6-4, 6-3
2026-05-09vs NWW-MI-ChangLost 12
L#1 DoublesKevin Mcdonald / Farhan Naeem Khan vs Oliver Chang / Varun Kamat3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKumar Bhat vs Lee Slaughter6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesShuo Shang / Richard Gould vs Michael Brick / Chad Rowe6-1, 6-2
2026-04-25vs CAC/SL-Moonballers-TulgaWon 30
W#1 DoublesDavid Eckols / Forrest Reda vs Patrick Normile / Hong Ma6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesKevin Mcdonald vs Tuvshin Tulga6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesIan Dangla / Farhan Naeem Khan vs Shane Nelson / Naveen Gande6-3, 6-1
2026-04-24vs ETC-Team2-BoxWon 30
W#1 DoublesKumar Bhat / Kevin Mcdonald vs Harish Mallidi / Oveys Hedayati6-3, 7-6
W#1 SinglesIan Dangla vs Armin Alaghi6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesForrest Reda / Jorge Calugas Ii vs Miroslav Spassov / Venkat Mahalingam6-2, 6-1
2026-04-18vs WSC-ACE-ZhuLost 12
W#1 DoublesKumar Bhat / Kevin Mcdonald vs Shawn Zhang / Zi Lin6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesIan Dangla vs Mitch Zhu2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Eckols / Shuo Shang vs Eddie Tseng / Jay Kaycee2-6, 3-6
2026-04-11vs MC-M 2.5-PurgananWon 30
W#1 DoublesDavid Eckols / Kevin Mcdonald vs Senthil Kumar Muthu / Aditya Choudhary6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKumar Bhat vs Prateek Shankar6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRichard Gould / Shuo Shang vs Wayne Zhao / Zheng Hao Tang6-2, 6-0
2026-04-03vs CAC/SL-Moonballers-TulgaWon 30
W#1 DoublesJorge Calugas Ii / Kumar Bhat vs Colin Bohn / Sean Diven6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesKevin Mcdonald vs Juefei Yan6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesRichard Gould / Forrest Reda vs Tuvshin Tulga / Hong Ma6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.51 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Kevin Mcdonald
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.71
Jorge Calugas Ii
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 2.5
2.46
Ian Dangla
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.46
Forrest Reda
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Singles 22% · published 2.5
2.40
Shuo Shang
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 2.5
2.35
David Eckols
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.33
Kumar Bhat
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 2.5
2.28
Farhan Naeem Khan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.09
Richard Gould
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Gagan Singh
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Forrest Reda + Jorge Calugas Ii5077% games+13.6% vs expected
Forrest Reda + David Eckols7161% games+3.3% vs expected
Kumar Bhat + Kevin Mcdonald303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kevin Mcdonald
15W–4L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.48
2.5
Jorge Calugas Ii
18W–12L career · type S · 7 lines in 2026
0%7%93%
2.71
Ian Dangla
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%61%39%
2.46
2.5
Forrest Reda
57W–47L career · 9 lines in 2026
0%61%39%
2.46
2.5
Shuo Shang
5W–9L career · type S · 8 lines in 2026
0%76%24%
2.40
2.5
David Eckols
11W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%85%15%
2.35
2.5
Kumar Bhat
24W–9L career · type S · 7 lines in 2026
0%89%11%
2.33
Farhan Naeem Khan
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%94%6%
2.28
2.5
Richard Gould
13W–48L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.09
Gagan Singh
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.