Teams

2022 Tri Level Men's 40 - Carlos Gonzalez

2022 Tri Level 40 & Over · 2022 Tri Level Mens 40

10 players · average NTRP 3.40 / PUERTO RICO

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
L#1 DoublesJuan Guzman / Gabriel Llanos vs Javier Moreno / Jose Santiago1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesManuel Lemus Melendez / Manuel Principe Acosta vs Joel Melendez / Jaime Melendez Ayala6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesNelson Mejias-Diaz / German Acevedo vs Edwin Ramos / Oscar Ramon Cruz7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRicardo Davila Canino / Manuel Principe Acosta vs Ramon Amado / Alejandro Rivera Pagan3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCarlos Gonzalez Cordero / Gabriel Llanos vs Rafael Vazquez Paniagua / Hector Rivera Martinez0-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesGerman Acevedo / Nelson Mejias-Diaz vs Angel Hernandez / Ricardo Davila Pagan7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJuan Guzman / Gabriel Llanos vs Luis de la Rosa / Jose Ortuzar1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2022 Tri Level Mens 40 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Nelson Mejias-Diaz
published
3.73
German Acevedo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.71
3.52
Jose Zofakis
published
2.95
Manuel Principe Acosta
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.94
Gabriel Llanos
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Rolando Ortiz Zayas
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jose Zofakis + German Acevedo1541% gamesnot enough data
Jose Zofakis + Nelson Mejias-Diaz2353% gamesnot enough data
Carlos Gonzalez Cordero + Gabriel Llanos224 matchesnot enough data
Carlos Gonzalez Cordero + Rolando Ortiz Zayas303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nelson Mejias-Diaz
22W–24L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Fernando del Valle Medina
19W–27L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
German Acevedo
90W–78L career · 2 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
Manuel Lemus Melendez
72W–17L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.71
Jose Zofakis
16W–46L career · no lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
3.52
3
Manuel Principe Acosta
45W–89L career · type A · 2 lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
2.95
3
Gabriel Llanos
44W–39L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Carlos Gonzalez Cordero
21W–28L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
2.66
Ricardo Davila Canino
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rolando Ortiz Zayas
17W–16L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.