Teams

C3 Woodlake Phelps

2021 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over Women 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-06-05vs C4 LPC EarleWon 10
W#1 SinglesJeanean Phelps vs Christie Wisotzki6-0, 6-1
2021-05-22vs C2 Dominion SpillareLost 02
L#1 SinglesIrene Shepherd vs Elizabeth Walkley4-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesJeanean Phelps vs Cory Dunn6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2021-05-15vs C7 Willow Oaks MatawaranLost 02
L#1 DoublesRebecca Schneeberger / Irene Shepherd vs Zinie Sampson / Cheri Stringer4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJeanean Phelps vs Morgan Hutter3-6, 3-6
2021-05-08vs C5 Three Chopt HennesseySplit 11
W#1 SinglesJeanean Phelps vs Susan Heatley6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRebecca Schneeberger / Irene Shepherd vs Michelle Hall / Christina Saunders6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2021-04-24vs C1 Salisbury JamWon 10
W#2 DoublesIrene Shepherd / Rebecca Schneeberger vs Katherine Duncan / Julie Nobles1-6, 7-5, 1-0
2021-04-17vs C6 CCV Hofheimer/BlackburnLost 02
L#1 SinglesIrene Shepherd vs Amanda Galanti1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesJeanean Phelps vs Abigail Fishero3-6, 4-6
2021-04-10vs C4 LPC EarleLost 01
L#1 DoublesRosie Ortiz / Jeanean Phelps vs Kim Earle / Lesley McKay4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2021-04-03vs C7 Willow Oaks MatawaranWon 10
W#1 DoublesTaryn Giroux / Irene Shepherd vs Anne Scher / Laura Vetter6-4, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Irene Shepherd
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.90
Jeanean Phelps
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.88
Adelaide Urban
published 3
2.86
Lisa Giangregorio
published
2.79
Judy D'Amico
published
2.79
2.77
Julia Morrison
published
2.73
Rosie Ortiz
published
2.72
Taryn Giroux
published
2.60
Laura Brawley
published
2.22
Diane Renkin
published 2.5
Meaco Coffey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeanean Phelps + Irene Shepherd10558% games+8.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Irene Shepherd
111W–81L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%89%11%
3.34
Jeanean Phelps
145W–152L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%78%22%
2.90
3
Adelaide Urban
5W–2L career · no lines in 2021
<1%82%18%
2.88
Lisa Giangregorio
7W–16L career · no lines in 2021
86%14%<1%
2.86
Judy D'Amico
6W–7L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%5%
2.79
Rebecca Schneeberger
10W–9L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%5%
2.79
Julia Morrison
2W–5L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
2.77
Rosie Ortiz
3W–1L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
2.73
Taryn Giroux
16W–11L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
2.72
Laura Brawley
5W–9L career · no lines in 2021
22%78%<1%
2.60
2.5
Diane Renkin
3W–5L career · no lines in 2021
0%99%1%
2.22
Meaco Coffey
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.