Teams

Apostle

2025 FW Combo Tournament · 8.5 Ladies

11 players · average NTRP 4.25 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-05-25vs FindleyWon 21
W#1 DoublesAreli Martinez / Sandi Shipley vs Corrine Quast / Andree Kale4-0
W#2 DoublesTamara Murer / Julie Smith vs Ashley Reaves / Erin Aldrich2-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesErin Davis / Laura Locke vs Aubrey Findley / Alexa Mallard5-7, 6-7
2025-05-25vs Needs SetsLost 12
W#1 DoublesAreli Martinez / Sandi Shipley vs Brooke Hodnick / Caryn Angus7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesPriscilla Schimming / Grace Sherouse vs Erin Piel / Heather Vik3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTamara Murer / Laura Locke vs Jody Hassemer / Leslie Eugenio6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2025-05-24vs AlbusLost 03
L#1 DoublesAreli Martinez / Laura Locke vs Kerry Schonwald / Mariajose Alvarez4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSandy Beasley / Sandi Shipley vs Elise Jeffery / Kera Watts5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPriscilla Schimming / Julie Smith vs Teresa Albus / Amy Morgan6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2025-05-23vs BadenLost 02
L#2 DoublesSandy Beasley / Lori Russo vs Kayleigh Holt / Kay Lewis6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPaulina Obreque Bucarey / Janet Apostle vs Ryoko Suzuki / Enya He2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Ladies have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.92 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.35
Tamara Murer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.29
Areli Martinez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.97
Tiffini Williams
published
3.94
Sandi Shipley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.81
Grace Sherouse
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Lori Russo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Laura Locke
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Janet Apostle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Paulina Obreque Bucarey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Priscilla Schimming
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Sandy Beasley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Locke + Sandi Shipley6458% games+15.3% vs expected
Tiffini Williams + Paulina Obreque Bucarey123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tamara Murer
14W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
4.35
4.5
Areli Martinez
17W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
4.29
Tiffini Williams
24W–43L career · no lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.97
Sandi Shipley
38W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.94
4
Grace Sherouse
8W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
1%92%8%
3.81
Lori Russo
23W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.63
Laura Locke
18W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
3.43
Janet Apostle
11W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Paulina Obreque Bucarey
3W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Priscilla Schimming
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sandy Beasley
5W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.