Teams

6-CCouto-HR

2023 Eno River Combo 40 & Over · Eno River 40 & Over Combo 7.5 Women Day

13 players · average NTRP 3.77 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-10-03vs 7-SHuang-DFCWon 30
W#1 DoublesBeth Huebner / Julie Spearman vs Lacey Chylack / Donna Spero6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Wyngaarden / Carrie Couto vs Sharon Huang / Julie Hollenbeck7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKay Mabe / Carrie Norry vs Jennifer Gillie / Elisabeth Miller6-2, 6-1
2023-09-26vs 1-ALeinbach-CHTCLost 02
L#1 DoublesKay Mabe / Julie Spearman vs Sara Howard / Brook Holton Sheahan2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesNancee Merritt / Lindsay Stanek vs Torey Wahlstrom / Adrianne Leinbach1-6, 1-6
2023-09-12vs 4-EHoover-HVFSplit 11
W#2 DoublesCarrie Norry / Donna Ware vs Joanne McCallie / Laura Riedel6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKay Mabe / Jaime Parker vs Susan Fekete / Samantha Starr1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-09-05vs 5-PMathena-HRWon 20
W#1 DoublesBeth Huebner / Carrie Couto vs Beth Loeb / Karin Yoch7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMelissa Lutz / Mary Fortin vs Katie Neal / Debbie Fuller5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2023-08-29vs 2-LFalk/MJenkins-CHCCLost 12
W#1 DoublesKay Mabe / Julie Spearman vs Barbara Estay / Lee Harris6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Wyngaarden / Lindsay Stanek vs Katherine Jeske / Lawson Travers4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDonna Ware / Mary Fortin vs Sarah Shelby / Deon Roach1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-08-22vs 3-MHansen-HVCCWon 21
L#1 DoublesBeth Huebner / Carrie Couto vs Mollie Williams / Jane Waters2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKay Mabe / Julie Spearman vs Meredith Howell / Linsey Hughes3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Wyngaarden / Lindsay Stanek vs Renee Hodges / Amanda Lacoff6-0, 6-4
2023-08-15vs 7-SHuang-DFCWon 30
W#1 DoublesBeth Huebner / Julie Spearman vs Susie Post-Rust / Susan Alden6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Wyngaarden / Carrie Couto vs Connie Kim / Lisa Ennis6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDonna Ware / Mary Fortin vs Jennifer Gillie / Elisabeth Miller6-2, 6-2
2023-08-08vs 1-ALeinbach-CHTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesBeth Huebner / Carrie Couto vs Vicky Arne / Tammy Bradley6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDonna Ware / Carrie Norry vs Kimber Barnett / Diane Adams6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Wyngaarden / Mary Fortin vs Jeanne Beckley / Beth Spinarski6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Eno River 40 & Over Combo 7.5 Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.10
Beth Huebner
published 4
3.83
Julie Spearman
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.79
Kay Mabe
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.66
Carrie Couto
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.65
Melissa Lutz
published
3.59
Nancee Merritt
published
3.50
Elizabeth Wyngaarden
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published 4
3.49
Erin Reiter
published 4
3.42
Lindsay Stanek
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.37
Carrie Norry
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.26
Donna Ware
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.11
Jaime Parker
published 3.5
3.10
Mary Fortin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beth Huebner + Carrie Couto6453% games+7.2% vs expected
Kay Mabe + Julie Spearman13853% games+6.3% vs expected
Julie Spearman + Carrie Couto12759% games+2.6% vs expected
Kay Mabe + Mary Fortin6753% games+0.1% vs expected
Lindsay Stanek + Julie Spearman15263% games−0.6% vs expected
Carrie Couto + Elizabeth Wyngaarden171547% games−1.9% vs expected
Lindsay Stanek + Carrie Norry14362% games−2.1% vs expected
Melissa Lutz + Nancee Merritt8749% games−2.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Beth Huebner
50W–29L career · no lines in 2023
<1%23%77%
4.10
4
Julie Spearman
168W–84L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.83
4
Kay Mabe
139W–143L career · 10 lines in 2023
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Carrie Couto
163W–176L career · 8 lines in 2023
10%89%<1%
3.66
Melissa Lutz
23W–17L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.65
Nancee Merritt
16W–16L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.59
4
Elizabeth Wyngaarden
111W–134L career · 9 lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
3.50
4
Erin Reiter
3W–18L career · no lines in 2023
54%46%<1%
3.49
3.5
Lindsay Stanek
115W–82L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Carrie Norry
82W–65L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%84%15%
3.37
3.5
Donna Ware
100W–185L career · 8 lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Jaime Parker
6W–18L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Mary Fortin
113W–105L career · 9 lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.