Teams

Team 2 zhang - BWB

2024 NOVA Combo Mixed · NOVA Combo Mixed 7.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.70 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-11-19vs Team 7 Bailys BruisersLost 01
L#3 DoublesQun Bi / XIAOCHUN JI vs Jeanne Baily / Sean Henry3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-11-02vs Team 3 Yu - Net DancersWon 10
W#1 DoublesLiqing Zhang / Xinxiang Zhang vs Jennifer Ko / Phiros Thach6-1, 6-1
W#1 DoublesShan Wang / Xinxiang Zhang vs Calvin Nguyen / Sherra Dung6-2, 7-6
2024-10-21vs Team 6 Acosta - High RollersLost 02
L#2 DoublesJeff Zhu / Qun Bi vs Rohit Munjal / Ashley Plexico3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesXinxiang Zhang / Liqing Zhang vs David Todd / Sharon Sabasteanski1-6, 4-5
2024-10-12vs Team 4 PiF 7.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesXinxiang Zhang / Shan Wang vs Megan Burski Wells / David Viar6-3, 3-5
2024-10-05vs Team 1 Pauldurai - Net NinjasWon 10
W#1 DoublesShan Wang / Xinxiang Zhang vs Keming Wu / Leslie-Anne Levy6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Combo Mixed 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Xinxiang Zhang
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.87
Janet Wu
published
3.78
Shan Wang
published
3.74
Winny Zhang
published
3.65
Yuan Zhang
published
3.63
Tana Jankowiak
published 4
3.52
Qun Bi
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.49
XIAOCHUN JI
published
3.44
Liqing Zhang
published
3.39
Jianli Pan
published
3.27
FENG LI
published 3.5
3.23
Alan Zhang
published 3.5
Richard Wang
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shan Wang + Xinxiang Zhang314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Xinxiang Zhang
96W–40L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.93
Janet Wu
41W–22L career · no lines in 2024
<1%84%16%
3.87
Shan Wang
31W–14L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.78
Winny Zhang
19W–18L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.74
Yuan Zhang
48W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%13%87%
3.65
4
Tana Jankowiak
103W–71L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%<1%
3.63
3.5
Qun Bi
74W–62L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%44%56%
3.52
XIAOCHUN JI
16W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
3.49
Liqing Zhang
9W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.44
Jianli Pan
10W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
FENG LI
8W–12L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Alan Zhang
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
Richard Wang
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.