Teams

KH:Point Taken:Clarke

2021 SCT Adult 40 & Over Women · 3.5 W - 3

18 players · average NTRP 3.33 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2021-04-11vs KH:Serves You Right:Smith/WoodruffLost 13
L#1 DoublesTracey Langlois / Beth Pearce vs Christa Struk / Jennifer Forlizzi7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesVirginia Maher vs Betsy Mettler1-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesMarjorie Eilertsen / Jesse Glionna vs Patricia Mallon / Jennifer Millones6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesEllen Clarke / Robin Schultz vs Shelby Smith / Jamie Behr5-7, 0-6
2021-03-21vs KH:Glam Slams 40+:HarnedLost 04
L#1 DoublesLynn Enquist / Tracey Langlois vs Irene Ricci / Susanna Nichols4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#1 SinglesVirginia Maher vs Brooke Sessions1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBeth Pearce / Cindy Lannon vs Kerri Arnold / Heidi Smith5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMarjorie Eilertsen / Carla Carroll vs Susan Luchars / Anna Danchak7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2021-03-13vs WRC:The Nanetters:Reilly/MoodyWon 31
W#1 DoublesLynn Enquist / Tracey Langlois vs Janet Crystal / Lorraine Cassol6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesVirginia Maher vs Carol Baldwin2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesBeth Pearce / Carla Carroll vs Meredith Schiffer / Mercedes Velgot6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJackie Williams / Shirley Liu vs Victoria Green / Myra Goldberg6-3, 6-0
2021-03-07vs WRC:The Nanetters:Reilly/MoodyWon 30
W#1 DoublesTracey Langlois / Denise Thomas vs Mercedes Velgot / Chris Reilly6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesBeth Pearce / Cindy Lannon vs Nadine Tanen / Janet Crystal5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesShirley Liu / Elena Burova vs Victoria Green / Myra Goldberg7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2021-02-28vs WRC:The Unpoachables:Moseley/UlfssonSplit 22
L#1 DoublesCarla Carroll / Cindy Lannon vs Janel Downs / Quinn Koziol6-7, 1-6
L#1 SinglesVirginia Maher vs Jamie Mais2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesTracey Langlois / Jackie Williams vs Molly Moseley / Lorraine Oldale6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJesse Glionna / Shirley Liu vs Kelly Chapple / Sarah Menchaca6-2, 6-3
2021-02-14vs KH:Spin Returns II:PearsonWon 31
L#1 DoublesCindy Lannon / Beth Pearce vs Catherine Fabrizio / Donna Garvin4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesVirginia Maher vs Camilla Medeiros6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesElena Burova / Tracey Langlois vs Myrna Gardner / Lori Pearson6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesEllen Clarke / Robin Schultz vs Angela Jameson / Marina Meyers4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2020-11-21vs WRC:The Unpoachables:Moseley/UlfssonSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMarisa Zamora / Carla Carroll vs Quinn Koziol / Ellyn Ulfsson2-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#1 SinglesVirginia Maher vs Kelly Chapple6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLiza Wong / Elena Burova vs Janel Downs / Alicia Mulieri6-7, 1-3
L#3 DoublesCatherine Thorpe / Jesse Glionna vs Susan Goetz / Kay Spencer6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2020-11-08vs KH:Spin Returns II:PearsonSplit 22
L#1 DoublesDenise Thomas / Cindy Lannon vs Catherine Fabrizio / Donna Garvin1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesBeth Pearce vs Renee Holmes6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLynn Enquist / Gwen Burmester vs Lori Pearson / Randa Trivisonno6-7, 6-6
W#3 DoublesJesse Glionna / Virginia Maher vs Karen Calby / Kathy Morrison6-4, 6-3
2020-10-25vs KH:Serves You Right:Smith/WoodruffLost 13
L#1 DoublesLynn Enquist / Tracey Langlois vs Tory Woodruff / Millyn Gaaserud3-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesLiza Wong vs Rebecca Soskin2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJesse Glionna / Marjorie Eilertsen vs Christa Struk / Jennifer Millones6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesEllen Clarke / Carla Carroll vs Malee Sparagna / Jamie Behr3-6, 3-6
2020-10-11vs KH:Glam Slams 40+:HarnedSplit 22
W#1 DoublesTracey Langlois / Lynn Enquist vs Mary Pasierb / Debra Ritchie6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesBeth Pearce vs Brooke Sessions6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesEllen Clarke / Stephanie Packard vs Barbra Bell / Cassie Jones6-7, 1-5
L#3 DoublesCindy Lannon / Marisa Zamora vs Erin Harris / Susanna Nichols2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 W - 3 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Marjorie Eilertsen
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Gwen Burmester
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Lynn Enquist
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.09
Robin Schultz
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.03
Carla Carroll
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.03
Beth Pearce
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3.5
2.79
Ellen Clarke
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.69
Shirley Liu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Cindy Lannon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.57
Elena Burova
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Catherine Thorpe
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Denise Thomas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jesse Glionna
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Liza Wong
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Marisa Zamora
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Stephanie Packard
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Tracey Langlois
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Virginia Maher
usually #1 Singles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ellen Clarke + Robin Schultz3246% games+7.5% vs expected
Tracey Langlois + Marjorie Eilertsen2643% games+5.3% vs expected
Ellen Clarke + Cindy Lannon2347% games+4.3% vs expected
Gwen Burmester + Lynn Enquist15761% games+1.1% vs expected
Beth Pearce + Carla Carroll3350% games+1.0% vs expected
Lynn Enquist + Tracey Langlois3453% games−1.4% vs expected
Beth Pearce + Cindy Lannon81047% games−1.7% vs expected
Cindy Lannon + Elena Burova0525% games−2.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marjorie Eilertsen
132W–85L career · 8 lines in 2021
1%90%9%
3.83
3.5
Gwen Burmester
34W–51L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Lynn Enquist
86W–89L career · 5 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
Robin Schultz
141W–102L career · 8 lines in 2021
23%76%<1%
3.09
3.5
Carla Carroll
45W–108L career · 5 lines in 2021
41%59%<1%
3.03
3.5
Beth Pearce
34W–49L career · 7 lines in 2021
41%59%<1%
3.03
3.5
Ellen Clarke
56W–146L career · type A · 4 lines in 2021
94%6%<1%
2.79
Shirley Liu
74W–120L career · 3 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Cindy Lannon
52W–119L career · 6 lines in 2021
10%89%<1%
2.66
3
Elena Burova
35W–70L career · 3 lines in 2021
30%70%<1%
2.57
Catherine Thorpe
24W–42L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Denise Thomas
4W–13L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Jesse Glionna
38W–16L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Liza Wong
34W–31L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Marisa Zamora
5W–8L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Stephanie Packard
9W–29L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Tracey Langlois
107W–74L career · 8 lines in 2021
not enough data
Virginia Maher
26W–28L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.