Teams

Humphrey

2024 Tri-Level Metro · 3.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / METROPOLITAN REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-05-05vs Korngut/MartinWon 21
L#1 DoublesLinda Humphrey / Joanna Ostrander vs Jennifer Rudd / Elizabeth Yuan0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLaura Pfister / MaryAnn Markle vs Sierra Weoss / Zoe Weiss6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKathryn Dennis / Lynn Duffy vs Laura Sisk / Andrea Luxenberg5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2024-04-29vs Keefe/ReynoldsLost 01
L#1 DoublesMaryAnn Markle / Robin Hoffman vs Sondra Lavin / Maria Savur3-6, 1-6
2024-04-23vs ChenLost 02
L#1 DoublesLinda Humphrey / MaryAnn Markle vs Wendy Shen / Bonnie Aves6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRobin Hoffman / Lynn Duffy vs Maiko Akiba / Linda Or2-6, 3-6
2024-04-08vs BernsteinLost 03
L#1 DoublesLinda Humphrey / Joanna Ostrander vs Linda Eichenbaum / Karen Hyams2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesRegina Carey / MaryAnn Markle vs Leigh Flayton / Christine Rodeo6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLynn Duffy / Kathryn Dennis vs Amy DeMattia / Nicole Sharett1-6, 3-6
2024-03-27vs GouldLost 02
L#1 DoublesLinda Humphrey / Kristin Franchock vs Caitlin Druker / Jasmine Harris Khalil2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRegina Carey / Eileen Stathis vs Kat Brown / Pam Widener0-6, 1-6
2024-03-21vs VareikaiteLost 12
L#1 DoublesJoanna Ostrander / MaryAnn Markle vs Justine Cooper / Hayley Mink4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRobin Hoffman / Denise Allegretti vs Sarah Jaramillo / Marija Vareikaite2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesLynn Duffy / Caroline Intrabartolo vs Joy Gryson / Mariela Ferrer6-3, 6-0
2024-03-01vs Metro: Bindler/LamLost 12
W#1 DoublesLinda Humphrey / Kristin Franchock vs Jenni Bourque / Anna Tang6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRegina Carey / Denise Allegretti vs Mimi Xu / Joan Pulupa1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMeg Riley / Kristen Bambury vs Ilana Adelman / Wenqi Hua2-6, 3-6
2024-02-14vs Ishizawa/ChengWon 30
W#1 DoublesLinda Humphrey / Joanna Ostrander vs Heather Harrick / Sarahjean Marhone6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRegina Carey / Laura Pfister vs Nicole Soltz / Dorothy Plechaty6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLynn Duffy / Kathryn Dennis vs Alena Morozova / Helen Cheng6-4, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Metro: Bindler/Lam08141023192
2Gould08131023183
3Korngut/Martin08111226210
4Keefe/Reynolds08121227224
5Humphrey0881636239
6Ishizawa/Cheng0822245286

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Denise Allegretti
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Caroline Intrabartolo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Eileen Stathis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jen Kelly
published
Joanna Ostrander
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kristen Bambury
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kristin Franchock
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Laura Pfister
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Linda Humphrey
published
Lynn Duffy
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
MaryAnn Markle
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Regina Carey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Robin Hoffman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Humphrey + Kristin Franchock5363% games+7.4% vs expected
Linda Humphrey + Joanna Ostrander8849% games+2.3% vs expected
Regina Carey + MaryAnn Markle213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Denise Allegretti
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Caroline Intrabartolo
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Eileen Stathis
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Jen Kelly
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Joanna Ostrander
12W–14L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kristen Bambury
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Kristin Franchock
9W–10L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Laura Pfister
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Linda Humphrey
16W–13L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lynn Duffy
10W–7L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
MaryAnn Markle
6W–5L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Regina Carey
4W–9L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Robin Hoffman
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.