Teams

HOF: Hook/Brown

2025 RI TRI Level · 3.5 Women

3 players · average NTRP 3.50 / RHODE ISLAND

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-12-07vs WB: West Bay Breakers/ZizzaWon 10
W#1 DoublesCatherine Brown / Amanda Hook vs Kim Zizza / Jessica Komari7-5, 6-4
2025-11-16vs CC: DiNardo/LeiteWon 10
W#1 DoublesAmanda Hook / Linda Nunes vs Jennifer Leite / Nancy DiNardo7-5, 6-3
2025-11-15vs WB: CeceriLost 01
L#1 DoublesCatherine Brown / Dawn Griffin vs Karen Meyer / Rose Pembroke6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2025-11-14vs EB: JAVa/KimWon 10
W#1 DoublesCatherine Brown / Amanda Hook vs Alice Kim / Jody Tanzman7-5, 7-5
2025-11-09vs WB: West Bay Breakers/ZizzaWon 10
W#1 DoublesCatherine Brown / Amanda Hook vs Jessica Komari / Gilda Piccoli3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-11-06vs EB: JAVa/KimLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmanda Hook / Linda Nunes vs Alice Kim / Jody Tanzman4-6, 1-6
2025-10-26vs WB: CeceriLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmanda Hook / Dawn Griffin vs Caroline Ceceri / Rose Pembroke6-7, 2-6
2025-10-06vs CC: DiNardo/LeiteWon 10
W#1 DoublesCatherine Brown / Linda Nunes vs Jennifer Leite / Kathleen Mello4-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Linda Nunes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Dawn Griffin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Amanda Hook
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amanda Hook + Linda Nunes5158% games+16.3% vs expected
Dawn Griffin + Amanda Hook123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Linda Nunes
28W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Dawn Griffin
33W–41L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Amanda Hook
52W–16L career · 6 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.