Teams

CK RED

2025 USTA ADULT 65 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 6.0 - 65 & OVER - DEN

7 players · average NTRP 2.90 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-07vs LTC-D GREENLost 03
L#1 DoublesElaine Wagner / Aura Leigh Ferguson vs Pamela Schmidt / Barbara Nevins4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSandy Reed / Barbara Paul vs Elizabeth Shields / Linda Wagner3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDebra Frye / JANI HERCHER vs Barbara Woodward / Ginny Laadt2-6, 0-6
2025-07-31vs CK PURPLEWon 21
W#1 DoublesKaren Bebber / Barbara Paul vs Mary LeSueur / Ellen McClurkin7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMarlene Samokishyn / Debra Frye vs Kathryn Dann / Barbara Chapman2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAura Leigh Ferguson / JANI HERCHER vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-07-24vs KC-RH ORANGEWon 21
W#1 DoublesSandy Reed / Karen Bebber vs Laurie Wagner / Trish Miller6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAura Leigh Ferguson / Marlene Samokishyn vs Judy Greco / Darlene Gonzales6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesElaine Wagner / JANI HERCHER vs Laurie van Sickle / Kathleen Wilhite6-2, 6-1
2025-07-17vs LTC-D YELLOWWon 21
L#1 DoublesElaine Wagner / Aura Leigh Ferguson vs Terri Jenney / Karen Noreyko1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesSandy Reed / Barbara Paul vs Tia Heneghan / Karen Kirby6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDebra Frye / JANI HERCHER vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-07-03vs BM YELLOWWon 21
L#1 DoublesElaine Wagner / Aura Leigh Ferguson vs Kathleen Turner / Nathalia Faribault3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKaren Bebber / Sandy Reed vs Miki Lorentz / Carol Markley6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDebra Frye / Barbara Paul vs Mary Hobson / Janet Lane6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2025-06-26vs MVCC REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesDebra Frye / JANI HERCHER vs Beth Eiseman / Julie Levey2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesSandy Reed / Marlene Samokishyn vs Mary Mittag-Miller / Linda Lea4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesElaine Wagner / Aura Leigh Ferguson vs Beth Richardson-McHugh / Linda McFarlin6-4, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 6.0 - 65 & OVER - DEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
Barbara Paul
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.91
Karen Bebber
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.62
JANI HERCHER
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.61
Sandy Reed
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.61
Debra Frye
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
Aura Leigh Ferguson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
Marlene Samokishyn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Bebber + Sandy Reed7356% games+1.1% vs expected
JANI HERCHER + Debra Frye2442% gamesnot enough data
Barbara Paul + Sandy Reed213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Barbara Paul
7W–1L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Karen Bebber
44W–48L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
JANI HERCHER
18W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
2.62
Sandy Reed
17W–24L career · 5 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.61
3
Debra Frye
27W–35L career · type A · 5 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.61
2.5
Aura Leigh Ferguson
1W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Marlene Samokishyn
2W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.