Teams

SGV Dare Doubles-Wang-WN-SU8

2022 Tri-Level League - San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Women 3.5

16 players · average NTRP 4.05 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-09-25vs LLW SGV Wild Cards-Tang-WN Su10Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAmy Liang / Tricia Guinto vs Mandi Collier / Lauren Nicole Finke2-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesAmy Liang / Kristina Chen vs Amy Jones / Linda Lyke6-1, 6-1
2022-08-28Lost 01
L#3 DoublesCaprina Auyong / Nancy Ray vs Antoinette Lessuk / Carla Denker5-7, 2-6
2022-08-21Split 11
W#1 DoublesTricia Guinto / Christine Chen vs Tina Mortensen / Stephanie Ellis6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKeiko Kagan / Ennie Gonzaga vs Karla Garcia / Lena Loha0-6, 4-6
2022-08-14vs SGV Mo Better Tri-DeRosa-WN-SA10Won 20
W#1 DoublesKristina Chen / Amy Liang vs Misty Kolchakian / Jennifer Avila6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChia Chi Tsai / Ennie Gonzaga vs Maria Sviridova / Elena Salinas6-3, 7-5
L#1 DoublesTricia Guinto / Amy Liang vs Cynthia Chou / Amy Jones7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesEnnie Gonzaga / Sandra Zane vs Mindy Schiffman / Patricia Francisco6-0, 6-3
2022-07-24Lost 01
L#3 DoublesSandra Zane / Caprina Auyong vs Irina Abadzheva / Antoinette Lessuk0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.35
Kristina Chen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.24
Tricia Guinto
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.23
Christine Chen
published 4.5
4.11
Diana Laguna
published 4.5
4.07
Jasmine Dai
published
3.79
Adrienne Beauvois
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.78
Cara Hofstad
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.59
Ennie Gonzaga
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.48
Nancy Ray
published
3.28
Chia Chi Tsai
published 3.5
3.27
Keiko Kagan
published
3.14
Kathy Wilkinson
published
3.06
Caprina Auyong
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Pat Guttormsen
published
3.05
Karen El-Kara
published
3.04
Sandra Zane
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristina Chen + Christine Chen11558% games−2.9% vs expected
Adrienne Beauvois + Cara Hofstad13856% games−3.9% vs expected
Ennie Gonzaga + Sandra Zane4260% gamesnot enough data
Caprina Auyong + Sandra Zane123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Kristina Chen
152W–92L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
4.35
4.5
Tricia Guinto
124W–84L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
4.24
4.5
Christine Chen
12W–12L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.23
4.5
Diana Laguna
3W–7L career · type A · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
4.11
Jasmine Dai
8W–5L career · no lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
4.07
4
Adrienne Beauvois
152W–120L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Cara Hofstad
218W–155L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Ennie Gonzaga
112W–93L career · 3 lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.59
Nancy Ray
11W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%56%44%
3.48
3.5
Chia Chi Tsai
6W–3L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28
Keiko Kagan
8W–2L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Kathy Wilkinson
11W–17L career · no lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
3.14
3.5
Caprina Auyong
86W–81L career · 2 lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.06
Pat Guttormsen
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.06
Karen El-Kara
2W–10L career · no lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
3.05
3.5
Sandra Zane
146W–141L career · 3 lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.04

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.