Teams

Cedars Island Girls

2024 Sarasota Adult 55 & Over Winter Weekday · 7.0 W Wednesday

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-03-13vs LWN ArringtonWon 20
W#1 DoublesLisa Simotes / Terry Olsen vs Tammy Hallam / Sherry Chase2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCatherine Bartlett / Faye Blakely vs Melissa Kinney / Lisa Johnson6-4, 6-3
2024-03-06vs Sarasota/Kersten/55&Over7.0WLost 02
L#1 DoublesJoan Hutchings / Jackie Fox vs Jenny Sherr / Sheryl Eckert6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJulie Carroll / Terry Olsen vs Lynn Bucknam / Pauline Daintith1-6, 3-6
2024-02-28vs LBK Club HowardLost 01
L#2 DoublesLisa Simotes / Jackie Fox vs Cyn Gillespie / Deanna Rollyson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-02-21vs Courtside KennedyLost 02
L#1 DoublesLisa Pauley / Faye Blakely vs Patty Buggy / Karen Kennedy6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJackie Fox / Francesca Bonte vs Tami Roadarmel / Rebecca Kiene6-7, 5-7
2024-02-14Lost 01
L#1 DoublesFaye Blakely / Tracey Hughes vs Lisa Adams / Robin Curtis6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2024-02-07vs Stoneybrook YoungSplit 11
L#2 DoublesFaye Blakely / Lisa Pauley vs Karin Dayton / Andrea Anderson6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBeth Arndt / Jackie Fox vs Debbie French / Stephanie Young5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2024-01-31vs LBK Public LevyWon 10
W#3 DoublesJackie Fox / Nilou Navab vs Kristy Owens / Nancy McLean2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-01-24vs LWR VavrekLost 01
L#1 DoublesMonica Darold / Jackie Fox vs Carol Frazier / Cindy Vavrek1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-01-10vs University Park GiaimoLost 01
L#2 DoublesJoan Hutchings / Faye Blakely vs Cecile Wooster / Jennifer Gould4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 W Wednesday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Lisa Simotes
published
3.23
Beth Arndt
published 3.5
3.17
Catherine Bartlett
published 3.5
3.17
Stephanie Kempton
published 3.5
3.13
Joan Hutchings
published
3.10
Lisa Pauley
published
3.02
Terry Olsen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.75
Jackie Fox
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Faye Blakely
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Faye Blakely + Terry Olsen2343% gamesnot enough data
Terry Olsen + Stephanie Kempton134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Simotes
41W–51L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Beth Arndt
6W–10L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Catherine Bartlett
3W–8L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Stephanie Kempton
36W–45L career · no lines in 2024
12%88%1%
3.17
Joan Hutchings
8W–6L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.13
Lisa Pauley
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
24%75%<1%
3.10
Terry Olsen
80W–129L career · 2 lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.02
Jackie Fox
60W–55L career · 6 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
2.75
Faye Blakely
56W–62L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.