Teams

BHSC-Parker

2024 Charlottesville Combo · Charlottesville Combo 8.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 4.17 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-10-22vs ACAC-BazydloWon 10
W#3 DoublesAmy Nolasco / Lesley Hock vs Mary Broden / Catherine DeSouza5-7, 6-0, 1-0
2024-10-13vs ACAC-BazydloLost 02
L#2 DoublesLesley Hock / Jennie Chiu vs Tatiane Restani / Lindsay Bazydlo6-3, 5-7
L#3 DoublesJennifer Clancy / Mary Voelmle vs Nevena Arsic / Fiona Ngo2-6, 4-6
2024-10-10vs ACAC-BazydloWon 10
W#3 DoublesMary Voelmle / Amy Nolasco vs Catherine DeSouza / Mary Broden7-6, 7-5
2024-10-06vs ACAC-BazydloWon 10
W#3 DoublesKristina Parker / Mary Voelmle vs Fiona Ngo / Joyce Steed6-3, 6-2
2024-09-29vs ACAC-BazydloLost 01
L#2 DoublesLesley Hock / Jennifer Clancy vs Erin Waters / Tammy Hertel4-6, 0-6
2024-09-24Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLorie Davis / Mary Voelmle vs Lauren Reichman / Tatiane Restani5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Combo 8.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.41
Linda Walker
published 4.5
Amy Nolasco
published 4.5
4.02
Lauren Suggs
published
3.77
Alexis Ryan
published 4
3.64
Mary Voelmle
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.62
Cindy Grace
published 4
3.60
Kimberly Glass
published
3.59
3.57
Lesley Hock
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Jennie Chiu
published
Lorie Davis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Grace + Farrell Vangelopoulos213 matchesnot enough data
Lauren Suggs + Kimberly Glass213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Linda Walker
48W–35L career · type S · no lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
4.41
4.5
Amy Nolasco
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lauren Suggs
12W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%43%57%
4.02
4
Alexis Ryan
12W–6L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Mary Voelmle
147W–99L career · 8 lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.64
4
Cindy Grace
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.62
Kimberly Glass
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.60
Farrell Vangelopoulos
10W–9L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.59
4
Lesley Hock
43W–49L career · 6 lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
3.57
Jennie Chiu
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lorie Davis
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.