Teams

LSVA-Vaughn/Jetton

2026 Lake Combo Doubles 40 & Over · 5.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
W#1 DoublesStephanie Vaughn / Laurie Watson vs Kierste Wade / Cynthia Enright6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJenny Grantham / Carla Kroh vs Sandy Lerette / Melissa Davidson6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLesa Conroy / Erin Dutka vs Kelly Greffin / Jennifer Cesmat6-1, 6-1
W#1 DoublesAndrea Steifova / Kristi Martin vs Susan Garrett / Laura Troyer6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJAMIE WORLAND / Erin Dutka vs Stephanie Niblack / Steva Sazama6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAngela Jones / Jenny Grantham vs Stacy Swaney / Julie Soto6-2, 6-1
2026-08-16vs LCOR-ORR/WestportWon 10
W#3 DoublesAngela Jones / Lesa Conroy vs Sandra Dunn / Beth Franck6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 5.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LSVA-Vaughn/Jetton2051236
2LCPH-PHILLIPS/KAUFFMANN/WP 40+ 5.51030123
3LSAR-Armstrong/Bailey 40+ 5.51142430
4LISI-Siler & Swaney/Jetton 40s 5.511241067
5LKGi-Gibson/Westport 5.5 40+000000
6LKGR-Greffin/ 40s W 5.5/Westport Mon pm0103636
7LCOR-ORR/Westport02151067

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.24
Laurie Watson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.91
Carla Kroh
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.83
Martine Maness
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.79
Erin Dutka
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.57
Andrea Steifova
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.49
Lesa Conroy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.36
JAMIE WORLAND
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.29
Jenny Grantham
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

JAMIE WORLAND + Erin Dutka5160% games+8.8% vs expected
Lesa Conroy + JAMIE WORLAND1734% games−12.3% vs expected
Lesa Conroy + Jenny Grantham224 matchesnot enough data
JAMIE WORLAND + Andrea Steifova213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Laurie Watson
39W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%4%96%
3.24
3
Carla Kroh
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.91
3
Martine Maness
54W–54L career · 1 line in 2026
1%87%12%
2.83
Erin Dutka
6W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.79
2.5
Andrea Steifova
9W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%30%70%
2.57
2.5
Lesa Conroy
34W–33L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%53%47%
2.49
2.5
JAMIE WORLAND
41W–58L career · 1 line in 2026
0%85%15%
2.36
Jenny Grantham
5W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%94%6%
2.29

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.