Teams

SD 3.5 LJ Beach and Tennis/ Michaelsen

2022 So Cal Fall Doubles - San Diego · SD Women 3.5

6 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-11-10vs SD 3.5 Mountain View/ LouisSplit 11
W#2 DoublesErica Alexander / Sarah Suiter vs Celina Tiznado / Lilyan Ruiz6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJennifer Greenfield / Jessica Rogge vs Maria Corbitt / Elsa Dominguez7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJessica Rogge / Sarah Suiter vs Julie Wunderly / Mie Bennett6-1, 6-3
2022-10-27vs SD 3.5 Mountain View/ LouisSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJaney Michaelsen / Sarah Suiter vs Cynthia Herrera / Guadalupe Garcia5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJessica Rogge / Jennifer Greenfield vs Elizabeth Ponce / Elsa Dominguez6-2, 6-4
2022-10-20Won 10
W#1 DoublesSarah Suiter / Jessica Rogge vs Christy Ward / Maria Simon6-1, 6-3
2022-10-13vs SD 3.5 Mountain View/ AngioneWon 10
W#1 DoublesJaney Michaelsen / Sarah Suiter vs Celia Hernandez / Cynthia Hensersky6-0, 6-1
2022-10-06vs SD 3.5 SDTRC/ MonzonWon 10
W#2 DoublesJessica Rogge / Cari Massaad vs Sandra Angel / Heather Ravenscroft7-5, 1-6, 1-0
2022-09-29vs SD 3.5 SDTRC/ PeinadoLost 01
L#2 DoublesJessica Rogge / Jennifer Greenfield vs Gretchen Shaffer / Kelly Wilson6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2022-09-22vs SD LLW 3.5 Mountain View/ WunderlyLost 02
L#1 DoublesRobyne Daniels / Sarah Suiter vs Sandy Dielman / Kerry Ott6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJennifer Greenfield / Jessica Rogge vs Junko Toda / Ryoko Adachi1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Sarah Suiter
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.68
Janey Michaelsen
published
3.66
Erica Alexander
published 4
3.38
Kristen Patterson
published
3.16
Cari Massaad
published 3.5
3.02
Jessica Rogge
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristen Patterson + Cari Massaad134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Sarah Suiter
89W–57L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.88
Janey Michaelsen
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Erica Alexander
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.66
Kristen Patterson
7W–9L career · no lines in 2022
82%18%<1%
3.38
3.5
Cari Massaad
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Jessica Rogge
30W–41L career · 7 lines in 2022
44%56%<1%
3.02

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.