Teams

ELW Crushers

2022 Pinellas NA Mixed Fall · 8.0 X Sunday

12 players · average NTRP 3.90 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-12-10vs Tarpon KronkLost 01
L#1 DoublesKirsten Willis / Dane Houston vs Abby Kronk / Jose Jarabo7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2022-12-07vs SPTC Holliday 8.0 XWon 10
W#2 DoublesDane Houston / Kirsten Willis vs Eugene Holliday / Kenzier McIntyre6-0, 6-0
2022-11-13vs McMullen HalmSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDane Houston / Elizabeth Gerlach vs Miguel Angel Goni Rodrigo / Joann Suyao3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSteve Unger / Kirsten Willis vs Felix Herrera / Karen Fischer6-4, 6-2
2022-10-30vs Seminole Lake TimminsLost 01
L#1 DoublesDane Houston / Monica Sanchez vs Kevin Burnett / Diana Zarreke3-6, 3-6
2022-10-23vs ELW OrrSplit 11
L#2 DoublesDane Houston / Kirsten Willis vs Tom Orr / Precious Cabiling3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMonica Sanchez / Steve Unger vs Sibila Harja / Joey Patti6-3, 6-3
2022-10-02vs Tarpon KronkLost 01
L#3 DoublesKirsten Willis / Steve Unger vs Abby Kronk / Jose Jarabo3-6, 6-7
2022-09-25vs McMullen HalmWon 10
W#1 DoublesDane Houston / Monica Sanchez vs Miguel Angel Goni Rodrigo / Gillian Irving6-4, 6-0
2022-09-18vs SPTC Holliday 8.0 XWon 10
W#2 DoublesDane Houston / Elizabeth Gerlach vs Rob Perry / Kenzier McIntyre6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 X Sunday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.23
Kayla Dyer
published
4.11
Elizabeth Gerlach
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.90
Kirsten Willis
published
3.77
Caleb Hirsch
published 4
3.75
Monica Sanchez
published
3.54
Dane Houston
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.47
James Bettencourt
published 3.5
3.14
Steve Unger
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Jillene Davis
published
Kevin Behan
published
Rena Khawam
published
Wendy Unger
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dane Houston + Elizabeth Gerlach2355% gamesnot enough data
Kirsten Willis + Dane Houston134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kayla Dyer
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.23
4.5
Elizabeth Gerlach
184W–98L career · 2 lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
4.11
Kirsten Willis
10W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%21%
3.90
4
Caleb Hirsch
13W–14L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
Monica Sanchez
24W–24L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Dane Houston
155W–187L career · 7 lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.54
3.5
James Bettencourt
15W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Steve Unger
105W–85L career · 3 lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
3.14
Jillene Davis
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kevin Behan
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rena Khawam
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Wendy Unger
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.