← Teams

MPRC-Sosa

2023 Adult 40 & Over · 4.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 4.14 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Joanne Wu
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
—
Kelly Branson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.88
Carrie Fisher
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 4
—
Sandi Bittler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.73
Sharon Grilley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.57
Marie Picard
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.45
Lynn Sosa
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Results9 ties
2023-06-18Split 2–2
L#1 DoublesCarrie Fisher / Sandi Bittler vs Shannon Bilstrom / Stacy Hawkins Parker6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJoanne Wu vs Pam Saftler6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLynn Sosa / Erica Tsuruta vs Allison Gregory / Brooke Burnett6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAmy Jean / Marie Picard vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-06-10Lost 1–2
W#1 SinglesJoanne Wu vs Rebecca Redding6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSandi Bittler / Akemi Okusada vs Sarah Morris / Krissy Wyngarden7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKelly Branson / Carrie Fisher vs Mary Anderson / Janet Tabor6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2023-06-03Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesKelly Branson / Sandi Bittler vs Sandy Garry / Sue Gregoire6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJoanne Wu vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLynn Sosa / Ren Toshié Miura vs Mary Green-Zwemke / Monika Thon3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTamara Witcosky / Carrie Fisher vs Krista Mikalatos / Colleen Sharkey7-5, 6-4
2023-05-21Won 3–1
W#1 DoublesAkemi Okusada / Marie Picard vs Michelle Beilstein / Karen Ohollaren7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJoanne Wu vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesCarrie Fisher / Sharon Grilley vs Allison Reid / Leslie OBrien7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLynn Sosa / Erica Tsuruta vs Allison Schenk / Mary Hlady6-4, 6-2
2023-05-13Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesMichele Bedritis / Carrie Fisher vs Bronwen Hager / Tara Henderson7-5, 6-1
L#1 SinglesJoanne Wu vs Kimberly Quach7-5, 7-6
L#2 DoublesMarie Picard / Erica Tsuruta vs Cassia Carpio / Stephanie Paulson5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2023-05-05Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesAmy Jean / Marie Picard vs Carrie Engle / Corinne Celko6-1, 6-2
2023-04-30Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesMarie Picard / Sharon Grilley vs Sandra Barnes / Honghui Liang6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLynn Sosa / Erica Tsuruta vs Sydney Taggart / Deborah Puhl6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCarrie Fisher / Sandi Bittler vs Bo Yu / Coral Nash6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2023-04-21Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesTracy Director / Kelly Branson vs Amanda Solomon / Tracey Riddle6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesTamara Witcosky / Sharon Grilley vs Mary Bullard / Karen Sullivan6-0, 7-5
2023-04-15Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesLynn Sosa / Tracy Director vs Deborah Borchers / Yumiko Pike6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesCarrie Fisher / Sharon Grilley vs Heidi Babi / Becky Rey4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAkemi Okusada / Sandi Bittler vs Naomi Steinberg / Lisa Provost6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Joanne Wu
17W–2L career
not enough data
—
4.5
Kelly Branson
16W–32L career
not enough data
—
4
Carrie Fisher
135W–80L career
0%97%3%
3.88
4
Sandi Bittler
34W–50L career
not enough data
—
4
Sharon Grilley
37W–33L career
4%95%1%
3.73
4
Marie Picard
128W–96L career
18%82%0%
3.57
4
Lynn Sosa
73W–57L career
48%52%0%
3.45

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.