Teams

Tigar/Chattanooga

2026 Adult 65 & Over-Chattanooga · 3.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.40 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-01vs Miller/ChattanoogaLost 12
W#1 DoublesEllan Hubbard / Susan Flanagan vs Ann Epps / Beth Daugherty7-5, 6-0
L#2 DoublesDianne Abney / Charlotte Henry vs Sarah Delay / Kim Glascock1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBernadette Dorris / Jill Chambless vs Janet Lawrence / Mary Miller5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2026-05-18vs Williams/ChattanoogaWon 21
W#1 DoublesEllan Hubbard / Pam Womack vs Pat Weddle / Maureen Morrison6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJoy Poole / Charlotte Henry vs Janice Hersperger / Lori Boyd6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDianne Abney / Bernadette Dorris vs Betty Andersen / Melinda Ellis3-6, 2-6
2026-05-04vs Williams/ChattanoogaLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnnette Poole / Susan Flanagan vs Lori Boyd / Sidni Wheatcroft3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDianne Abney / Jill Chambless vs Melinda Ellis / Maureen Morrison4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesEllan Hubbard / Pam Womack vs Kimberly Conner / Shirley Kile6-1, 6-2
2026-04-27vs Miller/ChattanoogaWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnnette Poole / Ellan Hubbard vs Ann Epps / Kim Glascock6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSusan Flanagan / Pam Womack vs Judy DeFoor / Caroline Ashton2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDianne Abney / Jill Chambless vs Jana Henson / Janet Lawrence6-1, 6-1
2026-04-13vs Williams/ChattanoogaLost 03
L#1 DoublesJoy Poole / Charlotte Henry vs Pat Weddle / Maureen Morrison3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Flanagan / Pam Womack vs Libby Dixon / Shana Patten7-6, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJill Chambless / Bernadette Dorris vs Deborah Nation / Betty Andersen1-6, 4-6
2026-04-06vs Miller/ChattanoogaWon 20
W#1 DoublesEllan Hubbard / Annette Poole vs Kim Glascock / Caroline Ashton6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesJoy Poole / Pam Womack vs Patty Vanvalkinburgh / Mary Miller6-2, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Tigar/Chattanooga3381022167

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Carol Tigar
published 3.5
3.44
Ellan Hubbard
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.39
Joy Poole
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.37
Annette Poole
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Dianne Abney
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.12
Pam Womack
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.84
Bernadette Dorris
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carol Tigar
58W–26L career · no lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.50
3.5
Ellan Hubbard
10W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%67%32%
3.44
Joy Poole
85W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Annette Poole
10W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.37
3.5
Dianne Abney
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%92%1%
3.19
Pam Womack
9W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.12
3
Bernadette Dorris
7W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
2.84

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.