Teams

Ybos/Memphis

2025 Adult 18 & Over Early Start League - Memphis · 3.0 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-11-17vs Lunsford/MemphisWon 41
W#1 DoublesEmily Green / Ashley Akil vs Lauren Cunningham / Breeana Crouch6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAllison Demilio vs Natalie Souder6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTheresa Carayiannis / Tindall Stephens vs Kyle Denney / Natalie McLean6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesStacy High vs Lyndsay Gronostaj1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesCarrie Ybos / Gail Gray vs Lauren Heard / Amy Smythe7-5, 7-5
2024-11-10vs Warren/MemphisLost 13
L#1 DoublesLyssa Ryan / Renee DeGutis vs Lauren Albertine / Kacie Butterworth0-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesAllison Demilio vs Dory Gaston6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRebecca Hannaman / Carrie Ybos vs Alaina Ward / Mary Smith4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesShannon Boyd / Susan Patrone vs Anne-Morgan Brookfield / Mariangeles Grear2-6, 3-6
2024-11-03vs Craig/MemphisLost 13
L#1 DoublesDana Webb / Renee DeGutis vs Delaney Williams / Victoria Jackson7-5, 0-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAllison Demilio vs Amelia Brewer6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesCarrie Ybos / Gail Gray vs Kayleigh Mitchell / Gina Cox6-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesLyssa Ryan / Amanda Whittington vs Elza McKenna / Jennifer Lee2-6, 3-6
2024-10-27vs Nabors/MemphisLost 23
L#1 DoublesGail Gray / Emily Green vs Libby Nabors / Paige Vaughan3-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesAllison Demilio vs Leigh Dill7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMelanie Sobczak / Dana Webb vs Heather Morgan / Patricia Harris3-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesAshley Akil vs Amanda Johnson6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSusan Patrone / Renee DeGutis vs Melissa Thomas / Kayleigh Turner5-7, 2-6
2024-10-20vs Picha/MemphisLost 23
W#1 DoublesWhitney Mowdy / Emily Green vs Krista Weber / Debbie Pacheco6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesStacy High vs Kathy Crowder1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCarrie Ybos / Theresa Carayiannis vs Ellen Skinner / Elizabeth Johnson2-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesAllison Demilio vs Jo Picha6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesGail Gray / Rebecca Hannaman vs Trish Kennedy / Marnie Stewart2-6, 5-7
2024-10-06vs Sentilles/MemphisLost 23
W#1 DoublesEmily Green / Whitney Mowdy vs Lisa Buckner / Melissa Hines6-3, 6-0
W#1 SinglesAllison Demilio vs Olivia House7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesGail Gray / Wesley Wade vs Harriet Dodd / Lauren Rogers1-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesStacy High vs Faith Ruch0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRenee DeGutis / Tindall Stephens vs Katherine House / Claire Sentilles4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.54 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.96
Allison Demilio
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3.5
2.93
Ashley Akil
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.72
Carrie Ybos
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.59
Melanie Sobczak
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
Rebecca Hannaman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.49
Whitney Mowdy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.44
Susan Patrone
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.38
Theresa Carayiannis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.34
Gail Gray
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.29
Renee DeGutis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.25
Amanda Whittington
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Dana Webb
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Lyssa Ryan
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Stacy High
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Tindall Stephens
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Wesley Wade
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca Hannaman + Carrie Ybos3745% games−1.9% vs expected
Carrie Ybos + Gail Gray2544% gamesnot enough data
Whitney Mowdy + Ashley Akil213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Allison Demilio
14W–20L career · 6 lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
2.96
3
Ashley Akil
29W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
Carrie Ybos
10W–27L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Melanie Sobczak
2W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
25%74%<1%
2.59
Rebecca Hannaman
11W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%29%71%
2.58
Whitney Mowdy
15W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%53%47%
2.49
Susan Patrone
18W–31L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%65%35%
2.44
Theresa Carayiannis
4W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
2.38
Gail Gray
12W–17L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%87%13%
2.34
Renee DeGutis
9W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%94%6%
2.29
2.5
Amanda Whittington
6W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%96%4%
2.25
Dana Webb
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lyssa Ryan
0W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stacy High
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tindall Stephens
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Wesley Wade
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.