Teams

LCTA40/Wigginton/CTC

STA 40 & Over Combo Doubles · 40 & Over Combo Women - 5.5

17 players · average NTRP 2.83 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-08-20vs LCTA40/Sullivan/LTPDIWon 30
W#1 DoublesLindsay Wigginton / Shirley Godfrey-Jackson vs Pooja Paunikar / Rebecca Roman6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Chung / Rachel Farmer vs Cece Fraunfelter / Kimberly Pearson6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAshley Pace / Irene Chambers vs Samantha Vaughn / Angela Williams6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-08-17vs LCTA40/CarrDale/DotyWon 30
W#1 DoublesShirley Godfrey-Jackson / Lindsay Wigginton vs June Brownlee / Pamela W Carr6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesAshley Pace / Susan Ballard vs Sharlene Douthit / Liz Hazen6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKimberly Krauk / Paula Oakes vs Tammy van Cleef / Elizabeth Kauffman6-1, 6-0
2025-07-30vs LCTA40/Elbe/DICWon 21
L#1 DoublesPaula Oakes / Jenny Werking vs Laura Smith / Diana Durik4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesRachel Farmer / Deborah Rosenbaum vs Rosa J McLaughlin / Natalie Barnett6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAshley Pace / Lindsay Wigginton vs Susan Rusterholz / Emma Martin6-2, 6-2
2025-07-23vs LCTA40/MoslerBalderose/MPRWon 21
L#1 DoublesLindsay Wigginton / Jill Wright vs Karen Obrien / Lauren Scott1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesPaula Oakes / Rachel Farmer vs Alisa Mosler / Lori Gossett6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSusan Ballard / Meredith Stafford vs Meredith White / Silvia Carrara7-5, 6-3
2025-07-16vs LCTA40/Jones/MPRWon 30
W#1 DoublesLindsay Wigginton / Rachel Farmer vs Jennifer Ireland / Rebekah Lockhart6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKatie McCabe / Deborah Rosenbaum vs Molly Jones / Katie Catalana6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesPaula Oakes / Kathleen Keys vs Lauren Cherry / Mikelyn McGinnis6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Combo Women - 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.55 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Shirley Godfrey-Jackson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Rachel Farmer
usually #2 Doubles 78%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published
2.73
Ashley Pace
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.67
Meredith Stafford
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.65
Doreen Romanello
published 3
2.63
Jenny Werking
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.57
Lindsay Wigginton
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.57
Kimberly Krauk
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.52
Deborah Rosenbaum
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.49
Katie McCabe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.44
Kathleen Keys
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.44
Deborah Faulkner
published 2.5
2.39
Irene Chambers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.36
Paula Oakes
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.25
Susan Ballard
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.18
Elizabeth Chung
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Jill Wright
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lindsay Wigginton + Rachel Farmer5169% games+14.7% vs expected
Kimberly Krauk + Jenny Werking9552% games+6.6% vs expected
Lindsay Wigginton + Ashley Pace4351% games+4.8% vs expected
Jill Wright + Lindsay Wigginton1445% games+4.2% vs expected
Shirley Godfrey-Jackson + Lindsay Wigginton5258% games+0.8% vs expected
Meredith Stafford + Susan Ballard2644% games−4.4% vs expected
Lindsay Wigginton + Kimberly Krauk3445% games−4.4% vs expected
Susan Ballard + Paula Oakes4346% games−6.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shirley Godfrey-Jackson
116W–101L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.02
Rachel Farmer
73W–56L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Ashley Pace
53W–63L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
Meredith Stafford
32W–39L career · 1 line in 2025
10%90%1%
2.67
3
Doreen Romanello
27W–35L career · no lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
2.65
Jenny Werking
24W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
16%84%<1%
2.63
Lindsay Wigginton
53W–60L career · 5 lines in 2025
28%71%<1%
2.57
Kimberly Krauk
23W–29L career · 1 line in 2025
30%70%<1%
2.57
3
Deborah Rosenbaum
19W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
2.52
Katie McCabe
6W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.49
Kathleen Keys
30W–64L career · 1 line in 2025
67%33%<1%
2.44
2.5
Deborah Faulkner
31W–66L career · no lines in 2025
0%68%32%
2.44
3
Irene Chambers
11W–44L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
80%20%<1%
2.39
Paula Oakes
22W–38L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%85%15%
2.36
Susan Ballard
39W–75L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.25
2.5
Elizabeth Chung
4W–5L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
0%99%1%
2.18
Jill Wright
26W–23L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.