Teams

Veltri - Chen/Wank

2022 Broward Adult 55 & Over - Night · 8.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.80 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-04-03vs Broward/Dillon - Levine/CarusoLost 02
L#1 DoublesDawn Doyle / Mayte Ruano vs Clarena Furtado / Natalia de Gregorio3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Wilsman / Alicia Dominguez vs Jeanne Wickwire / Donna Evertz6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2022-03-27vs Broward/Dillon - Levine/CarusoWon 10
W#2 DoublesYonghong Chen / Alicia Dominguez vs Theresa Caruso / Bea Tully6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2022-03-20vs Broward/Dillon - Levine/CarusoSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDawn Doyle / Cynthia Cervantes vs Cheryl Hicks / Carolina Gorman6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAlicia Dominguez / Mayte Ruano vs Theresa Caruso / Clarena Furtado3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-03-13vs Broward/Dillon - Levine/CarusoSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKumiko Currie / Mayte Ruano vs Jeanne Wickwire / Clarena Furtado6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesVeronica Wank / Cynthia Cervantes vs Loren Levine / Edith Schmidt0-6, 3-6
2022-03-06vs Broward/Dillon - Levine/CarusoWon 21
L#1 DoublesVeronica Wank / Mayte Ruano vs Clarena Furtado / Natalia de Gregorio6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAlicia Dominguez / Elizabeth Wilsman vs Raegan Hanson / Jeanne Wickwire6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCynthia Cervantes / Dawn Doyle vs Bea Tully / Theresa Caruso6-3, 7-5
2022-02-27vs Broward/Dillon - Levine/CarusoLost 02
L#1 DoublesKumiko Currie / Cynthia Cervantes vs Loren Levine / Jeanne Wickwire5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesVeronica Wank / Angela Famiglio vs Bea Tully / Donna Evertz5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Kumiko Currie
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.81
Veronica Wank
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Dawn Doyle
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.61
Mayte Ruano
published
3.24
Alicia Dominguez
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.16
Cynthia Cervantes
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kumiko Currie + Veronica Wank3548% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kumiko Currie
112W–81L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
4.29
4
Veronica Wank
149W–154L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.81
4
Dawn Doyle
27W–32L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Elizabeth Wilsman
1W–0L career · type S · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mayte Ruano
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.61
3.5
Alicia Dominguez
74W–151L career · 4 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Cynthia Cervantes
18W–16L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.16

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.