Teams

Kang/18/3.5/MD/Xavier

2025 NO Mixed 18 & Over · 3.5 NO (18&O) Mixed

14 players · average NTRP 3.33 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-28vs Thomas/18/3.5/MD/LCCLost 12
W#1 DoublesJulia Novack / Bryan Parks vs Stephanie Cheralla / William White4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJimi Lee / Mohamad Qayoom vs Kristen Kain / Marc Schexnayder4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJaesoon Han / Stephen Kearny vs Tanya Zacharia / George Zacharia1-6, 3-6
2025-06-23vs Gill/18/3.5/MD/NOLTCWon 21
L#1 DoublesAndrew Bofinger / Goudeau Renee vs Alexis Butler / Adam Wirth2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesWhawn Allen / Mohamad Qayoom vs Amanda Berger / Ryan Berger6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJaesoon Han / Stephen Kearny vs Charles Suhren / Kelley Gill6-3, 6-2
2025-06-16vs Black/18/3.5/MD/TRCLost 12
L#1 DoublesJaesoon Han / Bryan Parks vs Amanda Mouton / Juan Melguizo3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJulia Novack / David Weiland vs Janice Leaumont / David Varisco7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJimi Lee / Curtis Johnson vs Tran Black / ANIL GULER6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2025-06-09vs Phayer/18/3.5/MD/ASTCWon 20
W#1 DoublesMohamad Qayoom / Whawn Allen vs Anna Stenger / Chase Arceneauax6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJimi Lee / Ian Smith vs John Draper / Clare Gaskell6-7, 1-0
2025-06-04vs Ursin/18/3.5/MD/CPLost 12
W#1 DoublesJulia Novack / David Weiland vs Christian Recile / Leslie Clark3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesVeronika Rabon / Stephen Kearny vs Jason Bonnet / Kelly Walsh3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesWhawn Allen / Mohamad Qayoom vs Stephanie Murray / Ninh Tran2-6, 5-7
2025-06-02vs Decuers/18/3.5/MD/CPLost 03
L#1 DoublesJaesoon Han / Andrew Bofinger vs Nancy Decuers / Michael Swanson6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesWhawn Allen / Curtis Johnson vs Michele Carollo / Jeremy Tuman4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesShannon Marino / Stephen Kearny vs Lesley Davis / Iggy Liriano1-6, 0-6
2025-05-19vs Dubois/18/3.5/MD/ASTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesBryan Parks / Jaesoon Han vs Elizabeth Charvat / Thomas Diaz6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJulia Novack / David Weiland vs Rayne Martin / Oscar Sobrino6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesIan Smith / Shannon Marino vs Susan Fallahi / Phil Cooke2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 3.5 NO (18&O) Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Black/18/3.5/MD/TRC7017413157
2Ursin/18/3.5/MD/CP6114720176
3Decuers/18/3.5/MD/CP5215614145
4Thomas/18/3.5/MD/LCC43111021178
5Kang/18/3.5/MD/Xavier34101126179
6Phayer/18/3.5/MD/ASTC2551633227
7Gill/18/3.5/MD/NOLTC1671431206
8Dubois/18/3.5/MD/ASTC0751632219

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Bryan Parks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.41
Julia Novack
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.39
Jaesoon Han
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Andrew Bofinger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Curtis Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.24
Whawn Allen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.14
Shannon Marino
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Mohamad Qayoom
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.94
Goudeau Renee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.93
Jimi Lee
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.79
David Weiland
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.74
Veronika Rabon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.72
Ji Kang
published
2.70
Stephen Kearny
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bryan Parks + Jaesoon Han123 matchesnot enough data
Whawn Allen + Mohamad Qayoom213 matchesnot enough data
Julia Novack + David Weiland303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bryan Parks
15W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
Julia Novack
45W–40L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.41
3.5
Jaesoon Han
26W–33L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.39
3.5
Andrew Bofinger
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Curtis Johnson
7W–6L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Whawn Allen
30W–54L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.24
Shannon Marino
12W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
3.14
Mohamad Qayoom
22W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.02
3
Goudeau Renee
12W–38L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%67%32%
2.94
Jimi Lee
24W–51L career · 3 lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
2.93
3
David Weiland
20W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
2.79
Veronika Rabon
22W–61L career · 1 line in 2025
3%94%2%
2.74
Ji Kang
6W–44L career · no lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
2.72
Stephen Kearny
17W–24L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
2.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.