Teams

RCC RED

2024 CTA WOMEN'S SUMMER DAYTIME - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - SUMMER DAYTIME

8 players · average NTRP 3.10 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-08-07vs LTA-Q REDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRachelle Schowe / Brenna Hermes vs Krystal Thomas / Emma West6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDanielle Witte / Ann Marie White vs Erika Cistone / Paige Schauermann4-6, 0-6
2024-07-31vs CVTA BLUELost 01
L#1 DoublesRachelle Schowe / Chrissy Hasek vs Cristin Hanson / Megan Rudolph4-6, 5-7
2024-07-24vs BRMST REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesShirley Millson / Rachelle Schowe vs Eveline Grady / Melissa Rawsky6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesChrissy Hasek / Ann Marie White vs Cynthia Manley / Karen Gallo6-3, 6-3
2024-07-17vs BRMST BLUELost 01
L#2 DoublesRilla Baca / Danielle Witte vs Kelly Horace / Tracy Klein4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-07-10vs CVTA REDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKristen Hamill / Brenna Hermes vs Karen Crofton / Maggie Brubaker4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDanielle Witte / Chrissy Hasek vs Alison Hubbard / Susan MacLeod6-2, 6-3
2024-07-03vs MEA GREENSplit 11
W#1 DoublesShirley Millson / Rachelle Schowe vs Judy Savage / Andrea Barsch6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesDanielle Witte / Jacquelynn Johnson vs Rebecca DiMaio / Susan Wu0-4
2024-06-26vs TTA REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrenna Hermes / Rachelle Schowe vs Alecia Phillips / Kristen Womer6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - SUMMER DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Rachelle Schowe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.00
Chrissy Hasek
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.93
Kristen Hamill
published
2.70
Brenna Hermes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
Rilla Baca
published
2.57
Ann Marie White
published 3
2.48
Danielle Witte
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jacquelynn Johnson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rachelle Schowe + Brenna Hermes12264% games+9.1% vs expected
Kristen Hamill + Danielle Witte033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Rachelle Schowe
55W–13L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%85%15%
3.35
3
Chrissy Hasek
85W–43L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
3.00
Kristen Hamill
22W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Brenna Hermes
34W–30L career · 3 lines in 2024
8%91%2%
2.70
Rilla Baca
12W–6L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Ann Marie White
6W–11L career · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
2.57
3
Danielle Witte
54W–49L career · 4 lines in 2024
57%43%<1%
2.48
Jacquelynn Johnson
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.