Teams

Team Montana

2023 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER · 8.0 Mixed 18 & Over

7 players · average NTRP 3.75 / MONTANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-02-26vs Montana/Munro/18&Over8.0MXLost 03
L#1 DoublesRaymond Armstrong / Cyndy Desin vs Suzanne Taylor / Joshua Munro5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRichard Ecke / Anna Collins vs Jon Catton / Elizabeth Lund3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesFrank Witt / Jill Witt vs Amber Sparks / Gordon Terpe4-6, 3-6
2023-02-26vs Montana/Munro/18&Over8.0MXWon 21
W#1 DoublesFrank Witt / Jill Witt vs Susie Boyer / Joshua Munro6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRaymond Armstrong / Cyndy Desin vs Jon Catton / Elizabeth Lund1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesCassie O'Bryant / Tom Young vs Dick Collum / Mary Milkovich6-3, 6-4
2023-02-25vs Montana/Munro/18&Over8.0MXLost 12
W#1 DoublesRichard Ecke / Anna Collins vs Joshua Munro / Suzanne Taylor6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesTom Young / Cassie O'Bryant vs Jon Catton / Elizabeth Lund3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRaymond Armstrong / Cyndy Desin vs Gordon Terpe / Amber Sparks2-6, 6-7
2023-02-25vs Montana/Munro/18&Over8.0MXWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnna Collins / Richard Ecke vs Susie Boyer / Joshua Munro7-5, 7-6
W#2 DoublesJill Witt / Frank Witt vs Mary Milkovich / Dick Collum6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesCassie O'Bryant / Tom Young vs Amber Sparks / Gordon Terpe0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Anna Collins
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
2.93
Cyndy Desin
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Cassie O'Bryant
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Frank Witt
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Jill Witt
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Raymond Armstrong
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Richard Ecke
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Frank Witt + Jill Witt213 matchesnot enough data
Cyndy Desin + Raymond Armstrong033 matchesnot enough data
Richard Ecke + Anna Collins213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anna Collins
20W–38L career · 3 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.69
3.5
Cyndy Desin
59W–102L career · 3 lines in 2023
70%30%<1%
2.93
Cassie O'Bryant
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Frank Witt
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jill Witt
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Raymond Armstrong
7W–18L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Richard Ecke
14W–4L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.