Teams

BHSC

2023 Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over Women · Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.90 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-06-06vs ACACSplit 11
W#2 SinglesMary Voelmle vs Tory Stribling4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Ratcliffe / Sue Frazier vs Lynette Meynig / Lauren Reichman4-6, 1-6
2023-05-23vs Wannabes - Forest LakesSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJillian Dann / Mary Voelmle vs Beth Hollen / Corinne Haywood6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSue Frazier / Ellen Hayes vs Kathy Huddleston / Kelly Bauman4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-05-11vs ACACSplit 11
L#1 SinglesMary Voelmle vs Lindsay Bazydlo4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Ratcliffe / Sue Frazier vs Caroline Hamilton / Tory Stribling3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-05-09vs Wannabes - Forest LakesLost 01
L#2 DoublesVictoria Tremaglio / Sue Frazier vs Janie Shrader / Bridget Atwell5-7, 2-6
2023-05-02vs ACACWon 10
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Ratcliffe / Mary Voelmle vs Lauren Suggs / Amanda Daniero6-3, 6-4
2023-04-25vs Wannabes - Forest LakesSplit 11
L#1 SinglesMary Voelmle vs Qian Cai4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesSue Frazier / Allison Evanow vs Beth Hollen / Susan Bayliss6-2, 6-4
2023-04-19vs ACACWon 10
W#3 DoublesMary Voelmle / Victoria Tremaglio vs Stacy Moren / Amanda Daniero2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-04-18vs Wannabes - Forest LakesSplit 11
W#2 DoublesSue Frazier / Jillian Dann vs Kelly Bauman / Allison Ewing6-1, 6-1
L#2 SinglesMary Voelmle vs Fiona Ngo5-7, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Jillian Dann
published
3.77
Alexis Ryan
published 4
Allison Evanow
published 4
3.68
Janette Murphy
published
3.64
Mary Voelmle
usually #2 Singles 29%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.62
Cindy Grace
published 4
3.59
3.35
Katherine Morris
published
3.26
Sue Frazier
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Elizabeth Ratcliffe
published
Victoria Tremaglio
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Grace + Farrell Vangelopoulos213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jillian Dann
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.88
4
Alexis Ryan
12W–6L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Allison Evanow
1W–1L career · type A · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Janette Murphy
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Mary Voelmle
147W–99L career · 7 lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.64
4
Cindy Grace
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.62
Farrell Vangelopoulos
10W–9L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.59
Katherine Morris
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
86%14%<1%
3.35
3.5
Sue Frazier
35W–41L career · 6 lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.26
Elizabeth Ratcliffe
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Victoria Tremaglio
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.