Teams

CVTA BLACK

2024 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT

8 players · average NTRP 3.44 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-09-05vs BCC NAVYLost 03
L#1 DoublesBeth Marvel / Tara Peltier vs Beth Petersen / Natalia Harms4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesIsabella Jacobs vs Jackie Kramer3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSkylar Schutter / Linda Schutter vs Annah Worland / Shelly Edwards0-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-09-02vs LTA-P REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesBeth Spangler / Connie Mansour vs Gloria Andrews / Tanya Eisele1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesIsabella Jacobs vs Kristin Parsons3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesLinda Schutter / Jackye Whalen vs Stephanie Stone / Kris Graham2-6, 5-7
2024-08-29vs BRMST BLUESplit 11
L#1 DoublesBeth Marvel / Tara Peltier vs Sarah Post / Cheryl Williams5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLinda Schutter / Skylar Schutter vs Ann Ipsen / Kathy Depinto6-4, 6-3
2024-08-28vs BTA-IBM GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesConnie Mansour / Tracy King vs Stephanie Watson / Claire Simon1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesIsabella Jacobs vs Veronica Johnston7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLinda Schutter / Skylar Schutter vs Sally Lowell / Christy Valentine6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-08-15vs TTA BLACKLost 12
L#1 DoublesTara Peltier / Beth Marvel vs Kaylee Henley / Rossi Javernick6-7, 6-7
L#1 SinglesIsabella Jacobs vs Stephanie Saunders0-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesLinda Schutter / Connie Mansour vs Diana Goodreau / Kelsa Morgan6-2, 6-4
2024-08-01vs BCC NAVYLost 03
L#1 DoublesTracy King / Isabella Jacobs vs Rachel Forward / Beth Petersen3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesSkylar Schutter vs Jackie Kramer2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesConnie Mansour / Beth Spangler vs Katherine Honea / Petra McDonald4-6, 4-6
2024-07-25vs BRMST BLUELost 02
L#1 DoublesBeth Marvel / Skylar Schutter vs Kathy Depinto / Ann Ipsen2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesTara Peltier / Beth Spangler vs Carol Anderson / Carrie Korth4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Isabella Jacobs
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Beth Marvel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Tara Peltier
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.11
Skylar Schutter
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.10
Linda Schutter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.02
Jackye Whalen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.88
Beth Spangler
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Connie Mansour
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beth Marvel + Tara Peltier3349% games+8.7% vs expected
Beth Marvel + Linda Schutter6162% games+4.9% vs expected
Jackye Whalen + Linda Schutter13953% games+1.9% vs expected
Skylar Schutter + Linda Schutter111550% games−2.5% vs expected
Linda Schutter + Beth Spangler134 matchesnot enough data
Isabella Jacobs + Skylar Schutter213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Isabella Jacobs
16W–11L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Beth Marvel
40W–43L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Tara Peltier
34W–46L career · 4 lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Skylar Schutter
21W–30L career · 5 lines in 2024
19%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Linda Schutter
140W–87L career · 5 lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.10
3.5
Jackye Whalen
50W–65L career · 1 line in 2024
43%57%<1%
3.02
3.5
Beth Spangler
2W–38L career · type A · 3 lines in 2024
83%17%<1%
2.88
3
Connie Mansour
19W–26L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.