Teams

Mihalik/Nashville

2026 Adult 65 & Over - Nashville · 3.5 Men - Saturday Daytime

5 players · average NTRP / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Flight standings1 teams · 3.5 Men - Saturday Daytime
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Mihalik/Nashville000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Scott Welch
published
John Rowenczak
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Karl Kern
published
Michael Mihalik
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Robert Blankenship
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Scott Welch
38W–17L career · no lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
3.48
John Rowenczak
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Karl Kern
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Michael Mihalik
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Robert Blankenship
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.