Teams

OBanchik/NO'Brien (Life Time)

2025 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.22 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-05-05vs VTolson/KPetras (Firethorne)Won 40
W#1 DoublesNaomi O'Brien / Madelaine LeBlanc vs Viki Tolson / Courtney Slavin6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesKimi Parker vs Jennifer Voci6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesOlya Banchik / Laura Pratt vs Danielle Fricke / Deb Sokol7-5, 7-6
W#3 DoublesFelicia Ahn / Annika Leintz vs Nanda Hashe / Sheri Noot6-2, 6-1
2025-04-29vs TInga (Lifetime)Won 40
W#1 DoublesNaomi O'Brien / Madelaine LeBlanc vs Avani Bhamidipati / Reshmi Santhosh6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesFelicia Ahn vs Sharon Sullivan6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesOlya Banchik / Laura Pratt vs Luz Lim / Kate Lauren6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSun Moon / Annika Leintz vs Jasmine Fontaine / Tania Inga6-2, 6-3
2025-04-15vs VShannon (Raintree)Won 20
W#1 DoublesNaomi O'Brien / Madelaine LeBlanc vs Winnie Simmons / Theresa Joiner6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSun Moon / Kimi Parker vs Kimberly Powell / Margot Bizon6-4, 6-2
2025-04-08vs YSmith (Mason Wallace)Won 31
W#1 DoublesNaomi O'Brien / Laura Pratt vs Kate MacRone / Bridget Megginson6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesOlya Banchik vs Jan Albright6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAnnika Leintz / Lesly Carlton vs Kelly DiCristo / Yukiko Cooper3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSaima Barkat / Tara Malone vs Melissa Smith / Lynsey Weber1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-04-01vs SHerndon/SStaley (WSRC)Won 30
W#1 DoublesNaomi O'Brien / Madelaine LeBlanc vs Kimberly Borans / Heather Taylor6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesOlya Banchik / Laura Pratt vs Jurga Petrikis / Jeri Zangmeister6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSaima Barkat / Annika Leintz vs Tracy Lacroix / Sally Blocksom5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2025-03-18vs SChandler/NKoesel (Raintree)Lost 13
W#1 DoublesMadelaine LeBlanc / Felicia Ahn vs Niki Koesel / Katie Eggers6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesKimi Parker vs Kimberlee Curley4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTara Malone / Saima Barkat vs Susan Chandler / Suzanne MacVicar1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSun Moon / Seung Hee Noh vs Elizabeth Harvey / Tricia Shaw4-6, 2-6
2025-03-11Won 40
W#1 DoublesAnnika Leintz / Madelaine LeBlanc vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesKimi Parker vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesFelicia Ahn / Seung Hee Noh vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSaima Barkat / Tara Malone vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-03-04vs CLogar/RRiechelmann (WSRC)Won 31
W#1 DoublesLaura Pratt / Madelaine LeBlanc vs Heidi Casey / Olivia Day7-5, 6-1
L#1 SinglesAnnika Leintz vs Renata Riechelmann1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSaima Barkat / Lesly Carlton vs Randi Trojan / Beverly Russo6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSun Moon / Seung Hee Noh vs Rhonda Tate / Maryann Whalen6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Madelaine LeBlanc
usually #1 Doubles 54%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published 3.5
3.51
Naomi O'Brien
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.44
Felicia Ahn
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 3.5
3.35
Laura Pratt
published
3.29
Olya Banchik
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
2.98
Kimi Parker
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #1 Singles 44% · published 3
2.92
Lesly Carlton
published
2.81
Seung Hee Noh
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.80
Saima Barkat
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.75
Annika Leintz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3
2.73
Tara Malone
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Sun Moon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Naomi O'Brien + Madelaine LeBlanc20273% games+13.8% vs expected
Olya Banchik + Madelaine LeBlanc11459% games+0.6% vs expected
Naomi O'Brien + Olya Banchik8562% gamesnot enough data
Saima Barkat + Tara Malone4350% gamesnot enough data
Felicia Ahn + Olya Banchik2452% gamesnot enough data
Felicia Ahn + Madelaine LeBlanc303 matchesnot enough data
Seung Hee Noh + Tara Malone123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Madelaine LeBlanc
108W–19L career · 13 lines in 2025
<1%4%96%
3.75
3.5
Naomi O'Brien
134W–32L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.51
3.5
Felicia Ahn
89W–43L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.44
Laura Pratt
29W–8L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.35
3.5
Olya Banchik
106W–57L career · 9 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
3
Kimi Parker
69W–48L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
2.98
Lesly Carlton
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
71%29%<1%
2.92
3
Seung Hee Noh
38W–34L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Saima Barkat
34W–21L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.80
3
Annika Leintz
22W–16L career · 6 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Tara Malone
10W–24L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Sun Moon
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.