Teams

LifeTime Plano/Behrman-Hanold W4.5

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Thursday League

23 players · average NTRP 4.44 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-06-26vs Gleneagles/Timothy W4.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesAmy Ostella / Kristal Roberts vs Renee Davidson / Karen Huffman6-3, 6-1
2025-06-19vs Lakes/Hunt-Wollitz W4.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesCaitlin Rhodes / Kristal Roberts vs Kaitlin Lovern / Mary Allen7-6, 6-4
2025-05-29vs DAC/N. Prinz-Wheeler W4.5Won 10
W#3 DoublesKristal Roberts / Amy Ostella vs Mandy Pruitt / Juli Perez5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2025-05-08vs Garland/Smith W4.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAmy Ostella / Adriana Akhtar vs Tiffini Williams / Annette Wilson6-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for S W. Thursday League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.24 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.45
Christy Vutam
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 4.5
4.41
Celesta Caldwell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.41
Luisa Osorio
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.38
Melanie Finnegan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.35
Eri Matsumoto
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
4.32
Yvon Pho
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
4.31
Caitlin Rhodes
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.31
Sonia Moorthy
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Singles 14% · published
4.29
Marian Bednar
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
4.28
Keasha Behrman
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
4.28
Ana Castano-Mears
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.25
Val Weidlich
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.24
Anne Perez
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4.5
4.20
Sandy Mora
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.14
Breann Fierro
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.13
Teri Ware
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.11
Maki Berman
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
4.09
Adriana Akhtar
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.05
Kristal Roberts
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.78
Amy Ostella
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Hayley Herman
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Kristin Eggleston
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Rachel Stokes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sonia Moorthy + Melanie Finnegan7560% games+10.5% vs expected
Sandy Mora + Maki Berman4266% gamesnot enough data
Amy Ostella + Kristal Roberts3350% gamesnot enough data
Celesta Caldwell + Anne Perez4161% gamesnot enough data
Celesta Caldwell + Val Weidlich134 matchesnot enough data
Celesta Caldwell + Melanie Finnegan314 matchesnot enough data
Val Weidlich + Eri Matsumoto314 matchesnot enough data
Rachel Stokes + Luisa Osorio404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christy Vutam
31W–12L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
4.45
4.5
Celesta Caldwell
31W–15L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
4.41
Luisa Osorio
35W–11L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
4.41
Melanie Finnegan
15W–11L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%79%20%
4.38
Eri Matsumoto
25W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
4.35
Yvon Pho
27W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
4.32
4.5
Caitlin Rhodes
19W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
4.31
Sonia Moorthy
34W–17L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
4.31
Marian Bednar
23W–13L career · 7 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
4.29
Keasha Behrman
33W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
4.28
4.5
Ana Castano-Mears
13W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
4.28
Val Weidlich
10W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
4.25
4.5
Anne Perez
25W–11L career · 6 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
4.24
Sandy Mora
16W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
4.20
4.5
Breann Fierro
11W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
4.14
Teri Ware
22W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
4.13
Maki Berman
26W–22L career · 5 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
4.11
4.5
Adriana Akhtar
9W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
4.09
Kristal Roberts
5W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
4.05
4
Amy Ostella
5W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
Hayley Herman
4W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kristin Eggleston
4W–1L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rachel Stokes
11W–1L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.