Teams

Bako - Team Black

2024 Adult 40 & Over - Bakersfield · Women's 3.5 - Bake

15 players · average NTRP 3.44 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-02-25vs LLW - Bako - Team OhLost 01
L#3 DoublesMinda Owens / Marri Tillema vs Briana Starr / Lauren Eittreim1-6, 0-6
2024-02-18vs LLW - Bako - Team OhLost 01
L#2 DoublesMarri Tillema / Michelle Pisano vs Edyta Grant / Diane Bashirtash6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-02-11vs LLW - Bako - Team OhLost 01
L#3 DoublesMichelle Pisano / Marri Tillema vs Rhonda Slegers / Linette Holliday6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2024-01-21vs LLW - Bako - Team OhLost 01
L#3 DoublesMinda Owens / Meghan Carnegie vs Susan Frakes / Linette Holliday2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-01-14vs LLW - Bako - Team OhLost 01
L#3 DoublesMarri Tillema / Cheyenne Romanini vs Linh Bui / Diane Bashirtash2-6, 4-6
2024-01-07vs LLW - Bako - Team OhLost 01
L#3 DoublesMinda Owens / Marri Tillema vs Hyejung Oh / Jennifer Stewart1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 - Bake have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Marites Idica
published
3.41
Brooke Drake
published 4
Ashley Periera
published 3.5
3.23
Brooke Fernandez
published 3.5
3.13
Agnes DeJong
published 3.5
3.10
Crystal Neptune
published 3.5
3.08
Erin Black
published
3.04
Michelle Pisano
published
3.02
Meghan Carnegie
published
2.92
Cheyenne Romanini
published 3.5
2.90
Marri Tillema
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.76
Minda Owens
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Misty Haverstock
published
Rosemarie Galindo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marri Tillema + Minda Owens101253% games+10.4% vs expected
Marites Idica + Erin Black033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marites Idica
12W–21L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.44
4
Brooke Drake
12W–4L career · no lines in 2024
74%26%<1%
3.41
3.5
Ashley Periera
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Cheyanne Antongiovanni
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Brooke Fernandez
6W–8L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Agnes DeJong
12W–14L career · no lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
3.13
3.5
Crystal Neptune
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.10
Erin Black
8W–10L career · no lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.08
Michelle Pisano
7W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%38%62%
3.04
Meghan Carnegie
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
3.02
3.5
Cheyenne Romanini
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
72%28%<1%
2.92
3
Marri Tillema
49W–64L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
Minda Owens
39W–55L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
2.76
Misty Haverstock
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Rosemarie Galindo
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.