Teams

DC Tennis Club (3.0 men)

2026 Washington D.C. Singles · Washington D.C. Singles 3.0 Men

6 players · average NTRP 2.88 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-08-30vs 3.0 TerminettersLost 02
L#1 SinglesMark Renier vs David Quinn2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesJames Olsen vs Clinton Parks1-6, 2-5
2026-08-23vs RacqueteersLost 03
L#1 SinglesCharles Hutchison vs Leonardo Balieiro6-7, 1-3
L#2 SinglesLee Friedman vs Tracey Bernard4-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesJake Cumsky-Whitlock vs Daniel Volker2-6, 1-6
2026-08-09vs RacqueteersWon 10
W#2 SinglesCharles Hutchison vs Daniel Volker7-6, 3-3
2026-08-01vs 3.0 TerminettersLost 12
L#1 SinglesAndy Clark vs David Quinn4-6, 0-5
W#2 SinglesJake Cumsky-Whitlock vs Frank Green3-6, 5-1
L#3 SinglesJames Olsen vs Kenneth Shin1-6, 1-6
2026-07-05vs RacqueteersLost 01
L#1 SinglesAndy Clark vs Ethan Jost2-6, 6-0, 0-1
2026-06-28vs 3.0 TerminettersWon 20
W#2 SinglesJake Cumsky-Whitlock vs Charles Anamelechi6-2, 4-3
W#3 SinglesMark Renier vs EDWARD CHATTERS7-5, 3-2
2026-06-21vs RacqueteersLost 03
L#1 SinglesCharles Hutchison vs Leonardo Balieiro2-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesLee Friedman vs Timothy Murphy0-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesMark Renier vs Daniel Volker2-6, 2-6
2026-06-20vs 3.0 TerminettersSplit 11
L#1 SinglesCharles Hutchison vs Kenneth Shin2-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesAndy Clark vs EDWARD CHATTERS6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Washington D.C. Singles 3.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Racqueteers0612612106
23.0 Terminetters069918134
3DC Tennis Club (3.0 men)0661225172

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Andy Clark
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.79
Charles Hutchison
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.73
Jake Cumsky-Whitlock
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.64
Mark Renier
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.63
Lee Friedman
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.55
James Olsen
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andy Clark + Charles Hutchison224 matchesnot enough data
Jake Cumsky-Whitlock + Charles Hutchison123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Andy Clark
20W–35L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%6%94%
3.20
3
Charles Hutchison
13W–38L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.79
3
Jake Cumsky-Whitlock
20W–31L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
Mark Renier
4W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
2.64
Lee Friedman
1W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
16%84%<1%
2.63
2.5
James Olsen
3W–30L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%34%66%
2.55

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.