Teams

SE 6.5W 18&Over Spivey/Stewart

2025 Selma Southern Combo Doubles 18's · Women's 6.5

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-09-27vs SE 6.5W 18&Over FullerSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJessica Spivey / Landon Posey vs Rachel Todd / Melinda Fuller7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJulia Burns / Jennifer Roberts vs Leigh Chappelle / Rayne Osborn3-6, 2-6
2025-09-21vs SE 6.5W 18&Over FullerSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJessica Spivey / Amy Jones vs Leigh Chappelle / Alicia Beers6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKim Simpkins / Dana Bohannon vs Sid Utsey / Melinda Fuller3-6, 3-6
2025-09-08vs SE 6.5W 18&Over FullerWon 21
W#1 DoublesJessica Spivey / Landon Posey vs Rachel Todd / Melinda Fuller6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesRebecca Stewart / Julia Burns vs Leigh Chappelle / Alicia Beers6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKeisha Wilson / Dana Bohannon vs Sid Utsey / Taylor Hale2-6, 6-7
2025-09-02vs SE 6.5W 18&Over FullerSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKim Simpkins / Claire Mosley vs Sid Utsey / Jennifer Dobbs4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKeisha Wilson / Amy Jones vs Melinda Fuller / Taylor Hale6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Keisha Wilson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.18
Kim Simpkins
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Claire Mosley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Dana Bohannon
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Jessica Spivey
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
Julia Burns
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Landon Posey
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim Simpkins + Keisha Wilson224 matchesnot enough data
Landon Posey + Jessica Spivey213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Keisha Wilson
18W–10L career · 6 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Kim Simpkins
5W–11L career · 6 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
3
Claire Mosley
1W–1L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Dana Bohannon
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jessica Spivey
8W–3L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Julia Burns
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Landon Posey
3W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.