Teams

Ledray: No Faults

2026 Adult 55 & OVER EARLY START · 7.0 Men (Thur PM)

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-12-18vs Anderson: Line FindersWon 21
W#1 DoublesPaul Holten / Mike Hicks vs Kraig Leuthard / Oscar Oboza6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLeigh Carlson / Michael Trangle vs Bob Christiansen / Carter Anderson4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCarl Johanson / Craig Kuberski vs Mark Gold / Randolph Jennings1-6, 3-6
2025-12-11vs AlschlagerLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichael Trangle / Carl Johanson vs John Genz / William Kolstad0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesTimothy Finnerty / Chuck Tatsuda vs Jungyong Park / Gaylon Rust3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLeigh Carlson / Mike Hicks vs Lawrence Wong / David Wiggins6-3, 6-4
2025-12-04vs Hess Pupp 55+ 2026 Fall ESLost 12
L#1 DoublesPatrick Ledray / Mike Hicks vs Doug Anderson / Benedict Pupp0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesChuck Tatsuda / Timothy Finnerty vs Mark Cochrane / Mike Grimaldi6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesCarl Johanson / Michael Trangle vs Dan Huetteman / Kevin Youngberg1-6, 1-6
2025-11-20vs Dieperink: DeepsLost 03
L#1 DoublesPaul Holten / Michael Trangle vs Richard Weinberg / Chris Dale3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesChuck Tatsuda / Timothy Finnerty vs Ken Resnicow / Robert Logelin1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesStuart Wahlstrom / Patrick Ledray vs Niandong Liu / William Cadwallader5-7, 2-6
2025-11-13vs Fling Double TroubleWon 30
W#1 DoublesTimothy Finnerty / Leigh Carlson vs Jonas Nygard / Steve Palmer6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMichael Trangle / Paul Holten vs Matthew Fling / Peter Krause6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCraig Kuberski / Carl Johanson vs Joseph Marnell / John Smetana6-0, 6-1
2025-11-06vs Anderson: Line FindersSplit 11
L#2 DoublesCarl Johanson / Leigh Carlson vs Mark Gold / Todd Heilig1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesChuck Tatsuda / Timothy Finnerty vs Gene Scow / Arkady Shemyakin6-4, 6-2
2025-10-30vs AlschlagerWon 21
L#1 DoublesPatrick Ledray / Stuart Wahlstrom vs DAT HO / Gaylon Rust1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMike Hicks / Timothy Finnerty vs David Wiggins / Lawrence Wong6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCarl Johanson / Leigh Carlson vs Don Bauer / Mike Ericson4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-10-23vs Hess Pupp 55+ 2026 Fall ESLost 12
L#1 DoublesTimothy Finnerty / Chuck Tatsuda vs Benedict Pupp / Rick Johnston7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesStuart Wahlstrom / Patrick Ledray vs Mark Cochrane / Bill Book7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMike Hicks / Paul Holten vs Brad Zenner / Kevin Youngberg4-6, 4-6
2025-10-16vs Dieperink: DeepsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCarl Johanson / Craig Kuberski vs Timothy Lynch / Tom Larson7-5, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPatrick Ledray / Stuart Wahlstrom vs Chris Dale / John Carnahan7-6, 6-0
2025-10-09vs Fling Double TroubleWon 20
W#1 DoublesCarl Johanson / Craig Kuberski vs Jonas Nygard / Rob Stahley6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesStuart Wahlstrom / Patrick Ledray vs Doug Peterson / John Smetana6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Men (Thur PM) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Michael Trangle
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.26
Chuck Tatsuda
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.25
Craig Kuberski
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.22
Mike Hicks
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Leigh Carlson
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Patrick Ledray
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Paul Holten
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Stuart Wahlstrom
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Timothy Finnerty
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Timothy Finnerty + Chuck Tatsuda2644% gamesnot enough data
Stuart Wahlstrom + Patrick Ledray4355% gamesnot enough data
Timothy Finnerty + Leigh Carlson134 matchesnot enough data
Timothy Finnerty + Michael Trangle314 matchesnot enough data
Patrick Ledray + Michael Trangle224 matchesnot enough data
Michael Trangle + Mike Hicks224 matchesnot enough data
Leigh Carlson + Michael Trangle303 matchesnot enough data
Leigh Carlson + Mike Hicks213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Trangle
21W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%89%9%
3.31
3.5
Chuck Tatsuda
18W–35L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Craig Kuberski
20W–28L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Mike Hicks
17W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%92%2%
3.22
Leigh Carlson
13W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Patrick Ledray
10W–22L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Paul Holten
7W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Stuart Wahlstrom
17W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Timothy Finnerty
28W–40L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.