Teams

WI Adult 18&O 3.5 W GML Lake Country WAC Deppisch

2022 WI Adult 18 & Over · WI Adult 18 & Over 3.5 (Eve) Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.40 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesKristin Joyce / Kristin Hieb vs Emily Levene / Deborah Dziekonski6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesCat Long vs Amber Balistreri-Ottson0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesSarah Deppisch / Amy Marshall vs Beth Hlava / Kathryn Tweet6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKelly Hofbauer / Alexandra Doyle vs Jordan Lazovik / Margie Mesker-Grimm6-0, 6-2
W#1 DoublesJanet Jansky / Heidi Rozman vs Jennifer Garven / Carol Carr6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesAlexandra Doyle vs Susan Loomis0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKristin Hieb / Kristin Joyce vs Rena Weller / Jane Stephens6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesKelly Gryglas vs Amy Siech6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKelly Hofbauer / Amy Marshall vs Tricia Valentine / Amy Lukas6-3, 6-1
L#1 DoublesKristin Hieb / Kristin Joyce vs Chandana Tamma / Michelle Godden5-7, 6-7
L#1 SinglesKelly Gryglas vs Margaret Feind3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesHeidi Rozman / Cat Long vs Kamal Irani / Karen Stromsted2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKelly Hofbauer / Alexandra Doyle vs Meike Mansfield / Kathleen Oldenburg2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 DoublesKristin Joyce / Heidi Rozman vs Robin Devilbiss / Susan Kortas6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesKelly Gryglas vs Melissa Mann7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSarah Deppisch / Alexandra Doyle vs Tiffany Reilly / Jennifer Hernandez6-7, 3-6
L#2 SinglesCat Long vs Angie Caskey2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Marshall / Kelly Hofbauer vs Jacquie Fossett / Sue Connor5-7, 2-6
W#1 DoublesKristin Joyce / Heidi Rozman vs Kelly Thompson / Deborah Dziekonski6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesKelly Gryglas vs Lisa Schraufnagel3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJill Fitzgerald / Janet Jansky vs Kathryn Tweet / Beth Hlava6-1, 6-1
L#2 SinglesAlexandra Doyle vs Amber Balistreri-Ottson2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesKelly Hofbauer / Amy Marshall vs Jill Gardetto / Brigid Baber3-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesHeidi Rozman / Kristin Hieb vs Erin Mohrbacker / Gabrielle Hendrix4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesCat Long vs Katie Schultz2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Marshall / Kelly Hofbauer vs Brigitte Potter / Marjorie Mccarthy6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesC H / Alexandra Doyle vs Joyce Casey / Natalie Hendrix6-7, 3-6
W#1 DoublesKristin Joyce / Heidi Rozman vs Michelle Rausch-Neary / Olga Konrath6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesKelly Gryglas vs Krysta Schellinger3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSarah Deppisch / Kristin Hieb vs Barb Seidl / Taylor Seidl6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAlexandra Doyle / Kelly Hofbauer vs Alisa Lambo / Dawn Graham6-2, 6-4
W#1 DoublesKristin Hieb / Janet Jansky vs Lisa Nelson / Jane Stephens6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesKelly Gryglas vs Susan Loomis3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesHeidi Rozman / Cherise Edwards vs Carol Carr / Jennifer Garven2-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesCat Long vs Laura Vuchetich1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAlexandra Doyle / Kelly Hofbauer vs Heather Theder / Melissa Nelsen0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings21 teams · WI Adult 18 & Over 3.5 (Eve) Women
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Kristin Joyce
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.49
Sarah Deppisch
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Janet Jansky
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Alexandra Doyle
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #1 Singles 13% · published 3.5
3.18
Kristin Hieb
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Heidi Rozman
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published 3.5
3.01
Kelly Gryglas
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3.5
2.84
Kelly Hofbauer
usually #3 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 3
Amy Marshall
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Cat Long
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3
Jill Fitzgerald
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jill Fitzgerald + Heidi Rozman15368% games+6.6% vs expected
Heidi Rozman + Janet Jansky7258% games+0.3% vs expected
Kelly Hofbauer + Sarah Deppisch3449% games+0.3% vs expected
Sarah Deppisch + Kristin Hieb18955% games−1.7% vs expected
Kristin Joyce + Heidi Rozman7553% games−2.2% vs expected
Kelly Hofbauer + Amy Marshall101349% games−2.7% vs expected
Heidi Rozman + Kristin Hieb6553% games−8.0% vs expected
Kelly Hofbauer + Kelly Gryglas224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kristin Joyce
85W–36L career · 6 lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.54
3.5
Sarah Deppisch
104W–74L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Janet Jansky
60W–38L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Alexandra Doyle
3W–5L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Kristin Hieb
64W–55L career · 6 lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Heidi Rozman
114W–81L career · 10 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Kelly Gryglas
72W–100L career · 6 lines in 2022
46%54%<1%
3.01
3
Kelly Hofbauer
65W–65L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
2.84
3
Amy Marshall
11W–13L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Cat Long
22W–50L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jill Fitzgerald
49W–12L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.