Teams

Hillman - RS Clay

2021 Escambia Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.33 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-05-25vs Gowens - RS HardWon 10
W#2 DoublesEric Stewart / John Wimberly vs Gerald Day / Michael Ghiorso4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2021-04-27vs Esmonde - RS HardWon 10
W#1 DoublesJohn Wimberly / Richard Andresen vs Kirk Bradley / Glenn Langan6-4, 6-3
2021-04-22vs Escambia - SHL/FuentealbaLost 01
L#1 DoublesRichard Andresen / John Wimberly vs Ken McCurdy / Breck Ford6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2021-04-20vs Gowens - RS HardLost 01
L#1 DoublesAndrew Hillman / John Wimberly vs Nick Farkas / Michael Ghiorso3-6, 4-6
2021-03-30Won 10
W#1 DoublesJohn Wimberly / Richard Andresen vs Jeffrey Powell / Gerald Day6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Eric Stewart
published 3.5
3.34
John Whittenberger
published
3.22
Andrew Hillman
published 3.5
3.19
Kenneth Wallace
published
2.74
DONALD GREEN
published 3
John Wimberly
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Russell Ball
published
Todd Fisher
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrew Hillman + Eric Stewart2548% games−0.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Eric Stewart
19W–22L career · no lines in 2021
<1%86%14%
3.36
John Whittenberger
5W–8L career · no lines in 2021
<1%88%12%
3.34
3.5
Andrew Hillman
10W–12L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.22
Kenneth Wallace
13W–14L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.19
3
DONALD GREEN
1W–5L career · type M · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
2.74
John Wimberly
123W–97L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Russell Ball
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Todd Fisher
2W–6L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.