Teams

SFV-Acers

SFV-SoCal Doubles-18 & Over · SFV - Men 3.5

8 players · average NTRP 3.60 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-12-12vs SFV-40 LoveWon 21
W#1 DoublesBurke Franklin / Mauricio Muller vs Alberto Arradaza / Dexter Sarmiento6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJared Mano / RUBEN SIMON vs Roman Kuperman / Richard Verrier6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesJose MacKinney / Lee Tsai vs Dan Lula / Andrew Wheeler6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesJose MacKinney / Jared Mano vs Timothy Chun / Won Cho2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesBurke Franklin / Mauricio Muller vs Gonzalo Mendez / Aldo Angrisani6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesRUBEN SIMON / Lee Tsai vs Ankur Kapadia / Anil Kasinadhuni1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-11-07vs SFV-Ball BreakersWon 10
W#1 DoublesJared Mano / Jose MacKinney vs Jason Pivnik / Sebastian Carvajal7-5, 6-4
2021-10-24vs SFV-GladiatorsWon 20
W#1 DoublesMauricio Muller / Burke Franklin vs Mel Johnson / Jeff Sutterman6-0, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLee Tsai / Guillermo Giuliani vs Jeff Uslander / Soroosh Demooei6-1, 6-3
L#1 DoublesMauricio Muller / Burke Franklin vs Won Cho / Aldo Angrisani2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesLee Tsai / Jared Mano vs Gonzalo Mendez / Paul Ketrick4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2021-10-10vs SFV-40 LoveLost 02
L#1 DoublesBurke Franklin / Eric Chaimberg vs Dan Lula / Michael Dubkin6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLee Tsai / RUBEN SIMON vs Terry Wingo / Nicholas Araujo - (DQ)*4-6, 2-6
2021-09-11vs SFV-BBB Braemar Big BallersWon 20
W#1 DoublesLee Tsai / RUBEN SIMON vs Donald Evans / John Rubeli6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDavid Berkowitz / Burke Franklin vs Kevin Berson / Mark Goffman6-1, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV - Men 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Jared Mano
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
3.47
Burke Franklin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.42
Jose MacKinney
published
3.31
Lee Tsai
usually #3 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
3.30
Eric Chaimberg
published 3.5
3.24
Guillermo Giuliani
published 3.5
3.14
David Berkowitz
published 3.5
RUBEN SIMON
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jared Mano + Burke Franklin2350% gamesnot enough data
Jared Mano + Lee Tsai213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jared Mano
91W–52L career · 8 lines in 2021
<1%60%40%
3.97
4
Burke Franklin
157W–97L career · 6 lines in 2021
58%42%<1%
3.47
Jose MacKinney
7W–8L career · no lines in 2021
<1%<1%>99%
3.42
3.5
Lee Tsai
212W–155L career · 11 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Eric Chaimberg
16W–9L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Guillermo Giuliani
5W–4L career · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
David Berkowitz
4W–6L career · no lines in 2021
14%86%<1%
3.14
RUBEN SIMON
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.