Teams

MO/Cox/18&Over6.0Mixed

2025 Springfield Adult Mixed 18 & Over League · 6.0 Mixed

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MISSOURI

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-07-20vs Tony RoldanWon 21
W#1 DoublesJaeBok Moon / Yuliya Zubina vs Tony Roldan / Giselle Garcia6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAbigail Chastain / Eli Wachob vs Kenya Pearman / Jason Romero7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesStephanie Wachob / Ross Roark vs Lori Hunt / Jeff Marlin1-6, 2-6
2025-07-19vs Tony RoldanLost 12
L#1 DoublesRoss Roark / Stephanie Wachob vs Kevin Hofmeister / Giselle Garcia2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesEli Wachob / Melissa Cox vs Tony Roldan / Lori Hunt2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAbigail Chastain / Nick Hansen vs Jason Romero / Kenya Pearman4-6, 3-6
2025-07-19vs Tony RoldanWon 30
W#1 DoublesJaeBok Moon / Yuliya Zubina vs Kevin Hofmeister / Giselle Garcia6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNick Hansen / Abigail Chastain vs Jeff Marlin / Lori Hunt6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMelissa Cox / Eli Wachob vs Nicole Liljenquist / Jason Romero3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-07-18vs Tony RoldanLost 12
L#1 DoublesYuliya Zubina / JaeBok Moon vs Kevin Hofmeister / Giselle Garcia2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesStephanie Wachob / Ross Roark vs Kenya Pearman / Tony Roldan6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMelissa Cox / Eli Wachob vs Nicole Liljenquist / Jeff Marlin4-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 6.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MO/Cox/18&Over6.0Mixed227513108
2Tony Roldan225715112

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Stephanie Wachob
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.14
Abigail Chastain
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Eli Wachob
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
JaeBok Moon
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Nick Hansen
published
Ross Roark
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Yuliya Zubina
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Wachob + Ross Roark5356% gamesnot enough data
Yuliya Zubina + JaeBok Moon6170% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephanie Wachob
55W–57L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Abigail Chastain
13W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.14
Eli Wachob
8W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
JaeBok Moon
13W–3L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nick Hansen
7W–12L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Ross Roark
5W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Yuliya Zubina
10W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.