Teams

TKam/PBlandford (Mountainbrook)

2023 Singles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Singles 3.5 Men - Mon PM

4 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-07-31vs JPSchoubert/RSankaran (Life Time)Lost 12
L#1 SinglesTai Kam vs Steven Inga2-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesPatrick Blandford vs Vikram Kapoor6-2, 6-4
L#3 SinglesBill Helman vs Jean-Paul Schoubert1-6, 2-6
2023-07-24vs WDawson (OPRC)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesHeyward Bouknight vs Henry Ko2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 SinglesBill Helman vs Wally Dawson3-6, 3-6
2023-07-17vs KFranks (PPRSC)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesPatrick Blandford vs Justin D'Silva7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2023-07-10vs MThompson/IKlass (Windyrush)Won 20
W#1 SinglesTai Kam vs Victor Ellison7-6, 6-4
W#3 SinglesBill Helman vs Daniel Holden6-4, 6-4
2023-07-03Lost 03
L#1 SinglesPatrick Blandford vs Yiding Guo1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesHeyward Bouknight vs Tiecheng Liu0-6, 5-7
L#3 SinglesBill Helman vs Dan Li4-6, 0-6
2023-06-25vs JPSchoubert/RSankaran (Life Time)Split 11
L#1 SinglesTai Kam vs Rajesh Sankaran6-7, 2-6
W#2 SinglesHeyward Bouknight vs Biju Nair6-3, 6-2
2023-06-25vs JDichak (WSRC)Won 20
W#1 SinglesTai Kam vs Phillip Davidson6-1, 6-2
W#3 SinglesHeyward Bouknight vs Joseph Dichak6-1, 6-0
2023-06-19vs VDatta (Raintree)Split 11
W#1 SinglesPatrick Blandford vs Jarret Lewis6-1, 7-6
L#2 SinglesBill Helman vs Andy Love1-6, 4-6
2023-06-05vs WDawson (OPRC)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesTai Kam vs Henry Ko2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesBill Helman vs Will Smith1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Singles 3.5 Men - Mon PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Patrick Blandford
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.37
Heyward Bouknight
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.17
Tai Kam
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Bill Helman
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heyward Bouknight + Patrick Blandford1542% gamesnot enough data
Heyward Bouknight + Bill Helman3255% gamesnot enough data
Patrick Blandford + Tai Kam224 matchesnot enough data
Heyward Bouknight + Tai Kam123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Patrick Blandford
97W–75L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
3.50
3.5
Heyward Bouknight
51W–37L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
Tai Kam
40W–65L career · 5 lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Bill Helman
27W–42L career · 6 lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.