Teams

COE Buch SSL C18-7.5M

2022 WMI SSL USTA League Combo 18&Over Weekend Leagues · WMI SSL C18&O 7.5 M (6 player)

5 players · average NTRP 3.33 / WESTERN MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-05-22vs MC Noble SSL C18-7.5MSplit 11
W#1 DoublesNeeraj Buch / David Kocsis vs Brian Herr / John Schimpf6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSlaven Condric / Darin Swan vs Andrew DeBruyn / Carlos Labadia3-6, 4-6
2022-04-10vs MC Noble SSL C18-7.5MLost 12
W#1 DoublesNeeraj Buch / David Kocsis vs Andrew DeBruyn / Carlos Labadia6-0, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTimothy Bepler / Darin Swan vs Charles Krug / Chad Paluzzi1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSlaven Condric / Elias Kafantaris vs Matt Linsley / Timothy Milroy1-6, 2-6
2022-03-27vs MC Noble SSL C18-7.5MSplit 11
W#2 DoublesDavid Kocsis / Darin Swan vs Carlos Labadia / Mark Schultz6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesElias Kafantaris / Slaven Condric vs Matt Linsley / Tyler Nobel4-6, 6-7
2022-03-13vs MC Noble SSL C18-7.5MWon 30
W#1 DoublesDarin Swan / Slaven Condric vs Carlos Labadia / Tyler Nobel6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesNeeraj Buch / David Kocsis vs Stuart Noble / Chad Paluzzi6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesMariappan Ganesh / Elias Kafantaris vs Timothy Milroy / Brian Herr6-2, 7-5
2022-02-27vs MC Noble SSL C18-7.5MLost 02
L#1 DoublesDavid Kocsis / Peter Jones vs Charles Krug / Carlos Labadia1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDarin Swan / Elias Kafantaris vs Tyler Nobel / Matt Linsley3-6, 4-6
2022-02-13vs MC Noble SSL C18-7.5MLost 02
L#1 DoublesDavid Kocsis / Peter Jones vs Andrew DeBruyn / Timothy Milroy1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDarin Swan / Slaven Condric vs Matt Linsley / Mark Schultz4-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · WMI SSL C18&O 7.5 M (6 player)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MC Noble SSL C18-7.5M4210816155
2COE Buch SSL C18-7.5M2481023177

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Neeraj Buch
published
Darin Swan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.14
Elias Kafantaris
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
David Kocsis
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Slaven Condric
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elias Kafantaris + David Kocsis3747% gamesnot enough data
Darin Swan + Slaven Condric1444% gamesnot enough data
Elias Kafantaris + Slaven Condric033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Neeraj Buch
11W–16L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
3.5
Darin Swan
14W–24L career · type M · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Elias Kafantaris
27W–44L career · 4 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.14
3
David Kocsis
24W–27L career · type M · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Slaven Condric
5W–12L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.