Teams

Leon/Macko/55&Over6.0W

2025 Leon Adult 55 & Over · 6.0W Adult 55 & Over

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-03-23vs Kemp-BrownWon 20
W#1 DoublesJan Murdock / Mary MacKo vs Lourdes Ferris / Beverly Kemp6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAndrea Baker / Diane Dove vs Robyn Flowers / Debbie Hall6-0, 6-1
2025-03-16vs Kemp-BrownSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAndrea Baker / Diane Dove vs Priscilla Bailey-Brown / Claire Kerz5-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSally Davis / Mary MacKo vs Elizabeth Buck / Penny Mitchell7-5, 6-2
2025-03-15vs Kemp-BrownLost 01
L#1 DoublesJan Murdock / Mary MacKo vs Lourdes Ferris / Priscilla Bailey-Brown6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2025-03-02vs Kemp-BrownWon 10
W#3 DoublesJan Murdock / Mary MacKo vs Penny Mitchell / Robyn Flowers6-0, 6-4
2025-02-23Won 10
W#1 DoublesAndrea Baker / Diane Dove vs Claire Kerz / Elizabeth Buck6-0, 6-4
2025-02-09vs Kemp-BrownLost 02
L#2 DoublesDiane Dove / Andrea Baker vs Robyn Flowers / Priscilla Bailey-Brown3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesClaire Chiara / Sally Davis vs Ashley Sniffen / Elizabeth Buck1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-02-02vs Kemp-BrownWon 20
W#2 DoublesMary MacKo / Jan Murdock vs Debbie Hall / Elizabeth Buck6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesClaire Chiara / Nancy Klucher vs Robyn Flowers / Ashley Sniffen6-2, 6-3
2025-01-19Won 10
W#1 DoublesAndrea Baker / Diane Dove vs Elizabeth Buck / Lourdes Ferris6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0W Adult 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.91
Diane Dove
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.64
Claire Chiara
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.38
Andrea Baker
published 3
Jan Murdock
published
Joann Snyder
published
Margaret Mooney
published
Mary MacKo
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Nancy Klucher
published
Sally Davis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary MacKo + Claire Chiara4254% gamesnot enough data
Diane Dove + Andrea Baker123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Diane Dove
51W–31L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.91
3
Claire Chiara
46W–68L career · 2 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
2.64
3
Andrea Baker
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
2.38
Jan Murdock
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Joann Snyder
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Margaret Mooney
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary MacKo
81W–69L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nancy Klucher
10W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sally Davis
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.